Re: Testing DIB Engine (second part)

[Jeff Zaroyko]

On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Massimo Del Fedele <max(a)veneto.com> wrote:
> Here the second part, it contains winedib.drv code and changes to Makefiles.
>
> Still no way to enable/disable the engine, besides of deleting the .so
> inside dlls/winedib.drv.
>
> I'll wait for some feedback before going fourther.
>
> Ciao
>
> Max

Instead of deleting it, you could simply set winedib.drv to disabled in winecfg?

-Jeff

Testing DIB Engine (second part)

[Massimo Del Fedele]

Jeff Zaroyko ha scritto:
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Massimo Del Fedele <max(a)veneto.com> wrote:
> > Here the second part, it contains winedib.drv code and changes to Makefiles.
> >
> > Still no way to enable/disable the engine, besides of deleting the .so
> > inside dlls/winedib.drv.
> >
> > I'll wait for some feedback before going fourther.
> >
> > Ciao
> >
> > Max
>
> Instead of deleting it, you could simply set winedib.drv to disabled in winecfg?
>
> -Jeff

Yes, of course.
The final idea is registry/environment var; I posted the patch quickly 
because many people asked for.... and I've got no time to work on it on 
these days.

Ciao

Max

Testing DIB Engine (second part)

[Massimo Del Fedele]

I haven't still any clue if the way I started the DIB engine has the 
correct approach, I mean if I should follow this way with the hope to 
have it included in  main tree or not.... Can please somebody tell me 
something about ?

Ciao

Max

Testing DIB Engine (second part)

[Roderick Colenbrander]

> I haven't still any clue if the way I started the DIB engine has the 
> correct approach, I mean if I should follow this way with the hope to 
> have it included in  main tree or not.... Can please somebody tell me 
> something about ?
>
> Ciao
>
> Max

I would recommend you to visit #winehackers and start asking there. AJ is there too. I believe it was mentioned at WineConf that also Jesse his design wasn't good.

Roderick
-- 
Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger

Testing DIB Engine (second part)

[Massimo Del Fedele]

Roderick Colenbrander ha scritto:
> > I haven't still any clue if the way I started the DIB engine has the 
> > correct approach, I mean if I should follow this way with the hope to 
> > have it included in  main tree or not.... Can please somebody tell me 
> > something about ?
> >
> > Ciao
> >
> > Max
>
> I would recommend you to visit #winehackers and start asking there. AJ is there too. I believe it was mentioned at WineConf that also Jesse his design wasn't good.
>
> Roderick

Well, my design is a mix between Jesse's and Huw's ones, more the latter 
than the former. BTW, both designs are similars in concept.
Well.... I'll wait for some more suggestions :-)
Thank you for answer

Ciao

Max

Testing DIB Engine (second part)

[Jesse Allen]

On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Massimo Del Fedele <max(a)veneto.com> wrote:
> Roderick Colenbrander ha scritto:
> > > I haven't still any clue if the way I started the DIB engine has the
> > > correct approach, I mean if I should follow this way with the hope to
> > > have it included in  main tree or not.... Can please somebody tell me
> > > something about ?
> > >
> > > Ciao
> > >
> > > Max
> >
> > I would recommend you to visit #winehackers and start asking there. AJ is there too. I believe it was mentioned at WineConf that also Jesse his design wasn't good.
> >
> > Roderick
>
> Well, my design is a mix between Jesse's and Huw's ones, more the latter
> than the former. BTW, both designs are similars in concept.
> Well.... I'll wait for some more suggestions :-)
> Thank you for answer
>
> Ciao
>
> Max

If there is a discussion on this, let me know. I have limited internet
access for the next two weeks, so I won't be able to do much
currently. No one gave me any input on the project besides Huw, and
having both versions of code being so similar doesn't really tell me
much. Max was able to understand and fix bugs using both versions so
that is a good sign.

Jesse