Re: Account for permissions on Win2k - dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c

[Paul Vriens]

On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 17:09, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> If we dont have permissions, we don't...
> Checked for ERROR_NO_SUCH_PRIVILEGE
>
> Weirdly, Win2k does not recognize the last two, number 28 and 29.
>
> Evidence:
> http://test.winehq.org/data/200503041000/2000_IDWASEMPTY/advapi32:security.t...

It only fails for 1 w2k btw. The other 2 succeed, so it doesn't look
like a general w2k problem.

Couldn't it be a certain version of the dll? I've had the same issues
with shlwapi/registry. Although the majority succeeds now, some 'old'
dll's will still fail.

Could it be an idea, to have every test (at least 1 in a dll test) tell
the version of the tested dll? Or have a test within every dll that does
exactly this (version checking).

Cheers,

Paul.

Account for permissions on Win2k - dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c

[Jakob Eriksson]

Paul Vriens wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 17:09, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
> > If we dont have permissions, we don't...
> > Checked for ERROR_NO_SUCH_PRIVILEGE
> >
> > Weirdly, Win2k does not recognize the last two, number 28 and 29.
> >
> > Evidence:
> > http://test.winehq.org/data/200503041000/2000_IDWASEMPTY/advapi32:security.t...
>
> It only fails for 1 w2k btw. The other 2 succeed, so it doesn't look
> like a general w2k problem.
>
> Couldn't it be a certain version of the dll? I've had the same issues
> with shlwapi/registry. Although the majority succeeds now, some 'old'
> dll's will still fail.
>
> Could it be an idea, to have every test (at least 1 in a dll test) tell
> the version of the tested dll? Or have a test within every dll that does
> exactly this (version checking).

At least a trace would not hurt.  How do I tell a DLL version?

regards,
Jakob