winehq download page

[Ivan Leo Murray-Smith]

I sent this patch
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/10/0064.html
and can't think a reason in the world for it not to be applied, have I done
something wrong or what?

[Dimitrie O. Paun]

On October 11, 2003 10:22 am, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> I sent this patch
> http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/10/0064.html
> and can't think a reason in the world for it not to be applied, have I done
> something wrong or what?

Well, for one Jer is not very responsive to winehq patches.
For some reason it take him weeks sometimes to apply a patch,
if ever. Second, I mark my winehq patches with WineHQ: in the
subject, so he has a better chance of picking them up. I suggest
you do the same.

-- 
Dimi.

[Tom]

Dimitrie O Paun wrote:
> On October 11, 2003 10:22 am, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> > I sent this patch
> > http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/10/0064.html
> > and can't think a reason in the world for it not to be applied, have I done
> > something wrong or what?
>
> Well, for one Jer is not very responsive to winehq patches.
> For some reason it take him weeks sometimes to apply a patch,
> if ever. Second, I mark my winehq patches with WineHQ: in the
> subject, so he has a better chance of picking them up. I suggest
> you do the same.

Yea, I do LostWages:  I think he just gives the patches a little time
incase someone has a objection.. And I think that is a good idea.

Tom

[Jeremy Newman]

Yes, I'm very behind on the patches for the website. I do scan the
wine-patches list for anything that looks like a website patch. But
putting either WineHQ, Website, or Lostwages in the title will save me
some some. Certain people I commit immediately (how do you get on this
list? submit a few good patches ;) ), others I do wait at least a day or
so for someone to object to the patch. I don't comment myself much, not
usually opinionated on anything submitted.

I working on a complete revamp of the entire CodeWeavers website right
now. That is eating up 100% of my focus. I usually will not submit
patches unless I am actually at my desk at work. I have made some
exceptions, WWN issues and Wine releases.

Ivan, your patch should go in tomorrow. Assuming something does not blow
up at the office and my attention gets diverted. note to self: need less
volatile chemicals at the office.

On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 08:44, Tom wrote:
> Dimitrie O Paun wrote:
> > On October 11, 2003 10:22 am, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> > > I sent this patch
> > > http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2003/10/0064.html
> > > and can't think a reason in the world for it not to be applied, have I done
> > > something wrong or what?
> >
> > Well, for one Jer is not very responsive to winehq patches.
> > For some reason it take him weeks sometimes to apply a patch,
> > if ever. Second, I mark my winehq patches with WineHQ: in the
> > subject, so he has a better chance of picking them up. I suggest
> > you do the same.
>
> Yea, I do LostWages:  I think he just gives the patches a little time
> incase someone has a objection.. And I think that is a good idea.
>
> Tom