How far away are we from .net 3.0 install working?
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-June/074701.html says that the offline installer for .net 3.0 works fine with that one patch, but it didn't seem to work when I tried it. Anyone know what the story is? - Dan
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Dan Kegel<dank(a)kegel.com> wrote:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-June/074701.html says that the offline installer for .net 3.0 works fine with that one patch, but it didn't seem to work when I tried it. Anyone know what the story is?
The AppDB has a pretty good overview (AF keeps a close eye on it): http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=9828 from the looks of it, you need to hack around several bugs to get anywhere near working. -- -Austin
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Austin English<austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Dan Kegel<dank(a)kegel.com> wrote:
says that the offline installer for .net 3.0 works fine with that one patch, but it didn't seem to work when I tried it. Anyone know what the story is?
The AppDB has a pretty good overview (AF keeps a close eye on it): http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=9828 from the looks of it, you need to hack around several bugs to get anywhere near working.
He does put lots of info there, but he doesn't actually list which bugs are showstoppers for install. I suspect he won't put a simple recipe there until the showstoppers are finished, and supposedly the only showstopper left is LsaLookupNames2, according to comments in http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2009-June/074701.html http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16882 and http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16884 But I didn't have any joy when I tried it, hence my question. - Dan
On Saturday 01 August 2009 12:47:33 am Dan Kegel wrote:
But I didn't have any joy when I tried it, hence my question.
Here's a recipe for the standalone installer that works for me after applying the patch attached to this e-mail: $ sha1sum dotnetfx3.exe f3d2c3c7e4c0c35450cf6dab1f9f2e9e7ff50039 dotnetfx3.exe $ rm -rf ~/.wine $ sh winetricks dotnet20 $ export _SFX_CAB_SHUTDOWN_REQUEST=1 $ wine dotnetfx3.exe It's slow towards the end, too slow I think, but eventually it completes here. -Hans
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Hans Leidekker<hans(a)codeweavers.com> wrote:
Here's a recipe for the standalone installer that works for me after applying the patch attached to this e-mail:
$ sha1sum dotnetfx3.exe f3d2c3c7e4c0c35450cf6dab1f9f2e9e7ff50039 dotnetfx3.exe $ rm -rf ~/.wine $ sh winetricks dotnet20 $ export _SFX_CAB_SHUTDOWN_REQUEST=1 $ wine dotnetfx3.exe
It's slow towards the end, too slow I think, but eventually it completes here.
That's good news. That patch looks meatier than the similar patches by Aric and Louis that were posted to wine-patches earlier. How close is it to getting accepted? - Dan
On Saturday 01 August 2009 02:51:14 pm Dan Kegel wrote:
It's slow towards the end, too slow I think, but eventually it completes here.
That's good news. That patch looks meatier than the similar patches by Aric and Louis that were posted to wine-patches earlier. How close is it to getting accepted?
Close enough I hope, I'll submit it next week. -Hans
Hans Leidekker wrote:
On Saturday 01 August 2009 12:47:33 am Dan Kegel wrote:
But I didn't have any joy when I tried it, hence my question.
Here's a recipe for the standalone installer that works for me after applying the patch attached to this e-mail:
Does the patch break the .NET 2.0 install? If not can it be forwarded for AJ's review? James McKenzie
participants (4)
-
Austin English -
Dan Kegel -
Hans Leidekker -
James McKenzie