On Fri, 20 May 2005 23:16:12 +0200, Raphael wrote:
We only have to build a correct symt model to get it working perfectly
What exactly will this work allow - will winedbg get better as a result? At the moment backtraces already give function information... thanks -mike
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:22:02AM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
What exactly will this work allow - will winedbg get better as a result? At the moment backtraces already give function information...
From what I know, this will allow to build Wine without the -gstabs+ compilation flag. Ie Wine will understand the new (standard) DWARF2 debugging symbols.
Lionel -- Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/
On Saturday 21 May 2005 11:39, Lionel Ulmer wrote:
From what I know, this will allow to build Wine without the -gstabs+
compilation flag. Ie Wine will understand the new (standard) DWARF2 debugging symbols.
Yes, you are right :) dwarf2 debug format is the standard format since gcc3 (and dwarf3 format who is an dwarf2 extension is already specified so gcc4/5 may use it). Stabs format (use when -gstabs+ option is used) are only supported (without any evolution) for backward compatibility with olders debuggers. If you want to get maximum debug infos of recent gccs ou must use dwarf2 (and prepare future when stabs format will don't be more supported) Regards, Raphael
Mike Hearn a écrit :
On Fri, 20 May 2005 23:16:12 +0200, Raphael wrote:
We only have to build a correct symt model to get it working perfectly
What exactly will this work allow - will winedbg get better as a result? At the moment backtraces already give function information... it will display information for ELF modules with Dwarf2 debug info (instead of the STABS format) this will raise some day the question of which debug format we use for Wine's own use A+ -- Eric Pouech
participants (4)
-
Eric Pouech -
Lionel Ulmer -
Mike Hearn -
Raphael