Hi,
I got a bit stuck and would like to hear your opinion on the XInput
HID backend, specifically on the mappings, i.e. the code that
"accepts" a certain device based on its properties and then maps its
buttons and axes to XInput buttons and axes.
As long as the mappings are fixed, i.e. are not supposed to be
extended or edited by the user, everything can be compiled into
xinput1_3.dll. However, I would like to provide a "xinput.cpl"
control panel node for xinput similar to "joy.cpl", where the user
can not only test the XInput gamepads, but also manage the
XInput-HID backend mappings. The first part can be accomplished by
using xinput1_3.dll. However, in order to load and persist different
mappings, the second part requires access to the functions that
serialize and deserialize the mappings. It also needs some way of
getting raw capabilities and changes in HID devices in order to be
able to create new mappings.
Here are some possible ways of solving it:
- Extend xinput1_3.dll with the required management functions
and add a "wine/xinput_hid_mgmt.h" or similar header that
declares those methods. xinput.cpl could then simply use
xinput1_3.dll to perform all management functions. I'm not sure
if this would break anything due to the additional exports in
the dll.
- Extract the mapping load and store logic into a separate
"xinputhid.dll" or similar. I this case both xinput1_3.dll and
xinput.cpl would access this library to load and store mappings.
- Move the xinput core and backends into a driver and let
xinput1_3.dll access it via IOCTLs. I believe this is the way it
works on windows, although there doesn't seem to be any freely
available documentation regarding the internal architecture. The
XInput-HID backend could then create its own kernel object as a
management interface, which could be accessed by xinput.cpl.
This would have the added effect of having a single instance
managing the xinput devices if several programs are running at
the same time, which mimics the behavior of windows.
What do you think would be the best option? Is there another way
I haven't mentioned?
- Juan