Maarten why not focus on supporting applications that don't have viable open source solutions first? I can think of hundreds. 

The only thing iTunes will add, with full support, is ipod syncing (that isn't useless). 

Or should we avoid that debate?

On Feb 18, 2008 3:18 PM, Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Edward,

2008/2/17, Edward Savage <epssyis@gmail.com>:
> Why are we interested in iTunes? There seem to be plenty of alternatives
> available.
>
> Or are we talking about ipod compatibility specifically, as there are no
> viable alternatives to iTunes for syncing.
Because this is a project that runs windows apps in linux, instead of
writing alternatives for it? ;-)

Cheers,
Maarten.