Those issues are most likely the off-by-one error I'm currently working on,

but they already exist and those failures are not relevant to this patch. I hope to fix them with the next patchset after this one.

Regards,

Fabian Maurer

> Hi,

>

> While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.

> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be

> wrong, but could you please double-check?

>

> Full results can be found at:

> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=48543

>

> Your paranoid android.

>

>

> === debian9 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===

>

> user32:

> combo.c:767: Test succeeded inside todo block: Test 3, expected list height

> to be 0, got 0 combo.c:767: Test succeeded inside todo block: Test 12,

> expected list height to be 0, got 0 combo.c:767: Test succeeded inside todo

> block: Test 17, expected list height to be 54, got 54

>

> === debian9 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===

>

> user32:

> msg.c:14491: Test failed: bad time b5e4e9f