Hi Jeremy,
 

---

> Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:49:37 -0500
> From: jwhite@winehq.org
> To: leslie_alistair@hotmail.com
> CC: wine-devel@winehq.org
> Subject: Re: Right way to cope with user error in make test?
>
> Hi Alistair,
>
> > This could be a good option. libxslt should properly be non-optional
> > since msxml3 relys on it.
> >
> > From the Makefile.in, its appears to have linked to libxslt for quite some
> > time,
> > but was never an issue since it was never used.
> >
> > Francois Gouget raised this bug,
> > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13035
> > that libslt should be dynamic, which could be another option.
>
> I think in my case the problem is a bit different; I have the library -
> what I don't have are the development headers. Thus the linking all
> works, but HAVE_LIBXSLT is not defined, so the transform function
> ends up as a stub, and goes on to fail.
>
> And I still don't know a right answer.
>
> The attached patch is one approach - skip the tests in this case.
>
> Does this seem like a reasonable approach to folks?
>
Looks good to me.
 
Best Regards
 Alistair Leslie-Hughes

---

Click here Search for local singles online @ Lavalife.