On 2/10/22 18:43, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> On 2/10/22 18:36, Jin-oh Kang wrote:
>>
>> We still support GCC 4.x (an in-support RHEL/CentOS release uses it),
>> so I
>> think we still need some wrappers around it. That and the GCC bug.
>>
>
> The __sync intrinsices seems to have be there since GCC 4.2, then
> deprecated when __atomic where introduced in GCC 4.7. What's that bug?
>
Nvm I missed that part of the first patch.
--
Rémi Bernon <rbernon@codeweavers.com>