why not test for '?' and '.' which are the forms we know off, instead of letting the door ajar ?
A+
> Message du 19/10/05 18:27
> De : "Vijay Kiran Kamuju"
> A : "Hans Leidekker", wine-devel@winehq.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: fix for #3219
>
> I have kept it there incase of regressions
> We can just easily uncomment and test.
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay
>
> On 10/19/05, Hans Leidekkerwrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 October 2005 09:19, Vijay Kiran Kamuju wrote:
> >
> > > - /* MS mangled names always begin with '?' */
> > > - if (*sym->current != '?') return FALSE;
> > > + /* MS mangled names always begin with '?'
> > > + if (*sym->current != '?') return FALSE; */
> >
> > It's better to remove code then disabling it
> > this way. We can always refer to CVS history.
> >
> > -Hans
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>