Segin wrote:
you all may find intersting.
Not me. Nyah, nyah.
I went to make sure that Wine wasn't broken, so I re-exec'd the binary,
but only to get this:
I've recently seen exceptions too when trying to run Win3.1 (and DOS,
but I'm not sure that's supposed to work) applications.
Sucks, I wonder what can be done in general about that.
Just starting the application causes it to segfault, so one approach
could be to find a buckload of Win3.1 programs and create a testsuite
that just tries to run them and declare the test a success if they're
still running after 10 seconds.
No, seriously :-).
First chance exception: page fault on write access to 0x000f0400 in
32-bit code (0xb7df2e97).
Register dump:
CS:0073 SS:007b DS:007b ES:007b FS:003b GS:0033
EIP:b7df2e97 ESP:7fbff570 EBP:7fbff5b0 EFLAGS:00010246( - 00 -RIZP1)
EAX:00000000 EBX:7eee7ff0 ECX:00000023 EDX:00000000
ESI:000f0400 EDI:000f0400
Stack dump:
0x7fbff570: 00000000 7eed0e49 000f0400 00000000
0x7fbff580: 0000008c 7ffd50f0 00010000 7ffb190b
0x7fbff590: 7ffdcc24 7fc94988 00000000 0000ffff
0x7fbff5a0: 0000f30f 7eee7ff0 00000000 00000001
0x7fbff5b0: 7fbff5bc 7eed158d 7eee7ff0 7fbff5dc
0x7fbff5c0: 7eee51c4 7eec0000 00000001 00000000
Backtrace:
=>1 0xb7df2e97 memset+0x37 in libc.so.6 (0xb7df2e97)
2 0x7eed158d DllMain+0x22 in winedos (0x7eed158d)
3 0x7eee51c4 in winedos (+0x251c4) (0x7eee51c4)
4 0x7ffb0a2d call_dll_entry_point+0x15 in ntdll (0x7ffb0a2d)
5 0x7ffb11f2 in ntdll (+0x211f2) (0x7ffb11f2)
6 0x7ffb13c5 in ntdll (+0x213c5) (0x7ffb13c5)
7 0x7ffb2d8c LdrLoadDll+0x5e in ntdll (0x7ffb2d8c)
8 0x7fc6bab1 in kernel32 (+0x2bab1) (0x7fc6bab1)
9 0x7fc6bb36 LoadLibraryExW+0x4f in kernel32 (0x7fc6bb36)
10 0x7fc6bbe5 LoadLibraryExA+0x2d in kernel32 (0x7fc6bbe5)
11 0x7fc6bc0b LoadLibraryA+0x1b in kernel32 (0x7fc6bc0b)
12 0x7fc1f219 main+0xb7 in winevdm (0x7fc1f219)
13 0x7fc1fb0b in winevdm (+0xfb0b) (0x7fc1fb0b)
14 0x7fc730f3 in kernel32 (+0x330f3) (0x7fc730f3)
15 0xb7ee654b wine_switch_to_stack+0x17 in libwine.so.1 (0xb7ee654b)
0xb7df2e97 memset+0x37 in libc.so.6: repe stosl %es:(%edi)
You might want to file a bug report?
I think the core developers have much more interesting things to do
besides fixing bugs, so the best bet is probably to create a bug
report (with URL to the app) and wait for a developer to become bored
or hungry for a small victory.
The app doesn't have a web site, concidering that when it was written,
USENET, UUCP, and FTP were bascially all the networking options you had
(save email, but that's implied)