On 10/31/21 6:34 PM, David Kahurani wrote:
> Signed-off-by: David Kahurani <k.kahurani@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/commctrl.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/commctrl.h b/include/commctrl.h
> index 41abceb..d67f5f7 100644
> --- a/include/commctrl.h
> +++ b/include/commctrl.h
> @@ -3939,8 +3939,8 @@ typedef struct tagLVITEMINDEX
> (INT)SNDMSGW((hwnd),LVM_SETITEMW,0,(LPARAM)(const LVITEMW *)(pitem))
> #define ListView_SetItem WINELIB_NAME_AW(ListView_SetItem)
> #define ListView_SetItemState(hwnd,i,data,dataMask) \
> -{ LVITEM _LVi; _LVi.state = data; _LVi.stateMask = dataMask;\
> - SNDMSG(hwnd, LVM_SETITEMSTATE, (WPARAM)(UINT)i, (LPARAM) (LPLVITEM)&_LVi);}
> +{ LVITEMW _LVi; _LVi.state = data; _LVi.stateMask = dataMask;\
> + SNDMSGW(hwnd, LVM_SETITEMSTATE, (WPARAM)(UINT)i, (LPARAM) (LPLVITEMW)&_LVi);}
> #define ListView_GetItemState(hwnd,i,mask) \
> (UINT)SNDMSG((hwnd),LVM_GETITEMSTATE,(WPARAM)(UINT)(i),(LPARAM)(UINT)(mask))
> #define ListView_SetCheckState(hwndLV, i, bCheck) \
This doesn't match what SDK does.
Are you saying there is some other magic beyond what is already in this macro or a difference in width(s) used?