Ahh I see.
Thanks for clearing that up :)

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger@gmail.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 2015-02-13 um 13:46 schrieb Martell Malone:
>> What I pointed out last time is that you had xxx_count in some
>> places and count_xxx in others. I asked you to consistently use
>> names in the form of xxx_count.
>
> Checking back over my emails it was henri who said that he wanted
> it in the form _count
With *_count he meant the same as I mean with xxx_count. E.g.
mode_count, level_count, etc. The * in this case is not a C pointer
but supposed to be a wildcard.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=JTsL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----