On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Ricardo Filipe
<ricardojdfilipe@gmail.com> wrote:
> i know it's not what it does, it's an alternative someone refered in irc. i
> was wondering what you think would be the correct approach, since both fix
> the problem, the alternative just goes against the msdn documentation, which
> has been refered as not reliable :D
>

Please bottom-post on this mailing list.  My patch is correct except
for what I said earlier, so just take it, remove that bit and resubmit
it.

--
James Hawkins