Hi,

Thanks for your reviewing. great helpful to me.


I submit a new patch reflecting feedback.

https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2022-April/212598.html


Regards.,

Alex

22. 4. 2. 22:57에 Akihiro Sagawa 이(가) 쓴 글:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:30:23 +0900, Alex Kwak wrote:
The composition on the IME message is end, but the XIM string is
in-composition state, and the same string remains on the XIM
afterwards.
so, call X11DRV_ForceXIMReset and finish composition state in the XIM.

Wine-Bug: https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52754
Signed-off-by: Alex Kwak <take-me-home@kakao.com>
---
v2: When XmbResetIC is called and KeyEvent occurs, it is a problem with
some IME (i.e., ibus-hangul).
v3: implement X11DRV_FindXIC(..) for getting exists XIC.
---
 dlls/winex11.drv/ime.c    |  2 ++
 dlls/winex11.drv/x11drv.h |  1 +
 dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c    | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/ime.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/ime.c
index c1584930861..2fe78234671 100644
--- a/dlls/winex11.drv/ime.c
+++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/ime.c
@@ -753,6 +753,8 @@ BOOL WINAPI NotifyIME(HIMC hIMC, DWORD dwAction, DWORD dwIndex, DWORD dwValue)
                     myPrivate->bInComposition = FALSE;
                     ImmUnlockIMCC(lpIMC->hPrivate);
 
+                    X11DRV_ForceXIMReset(lpIMC->hWnd);
+
I understood the basic concept of this patch, but...

                     bRet = TRUE;
                 }
                 break;
diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/x11drv.h b/dlls/winex11.drv/x11drv.h
index f389f3e0836..de882a532f3 100644
--- a/dlls/winex11.drv/x11drv.h
+++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/x11drv.h
@@ -827,6 +827,7 @@ extern BOOL X11DRV_InitXIM( const char *input_style ) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
 extern XIC X11DRV_CreateIC(XIM xim, struct x11drv_win_data *data) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
 extern void X11DRV_SetupXIM(void) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
 extern void X11DRV_XIMLookupChars( const char *str, DWORD count ) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
+XIC X11DRV_FindXIC(HWND hwnd) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
You might want to use "extern" for consistency.

 extern void X11DRV_ForceXIMReset(HWND hwnd) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
 extern void X11DRV_SetPreeditState(HWND hwnd, BOOL fOpen) DECLSPEC_HIDDEN;
 
diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c
index 3994c2106cc..7a4ec432bbf 100644
--- a/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c
+++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/xim.c
@@ -249,9 +249,36 @@ static void XIMPreEditCaretCallback(XIC ic, XPointer client_data,
     TRACE("Finished\n");
 }
 
+/**
+ * X11DRV_FindXIC
+ *
+ * This function finds the already created XIC in itself and parents.
+ * If only the specified handle is get via X11DRV_get_ic, the XIC can be exists
+ * in the parents and cannot be get.
+ */
+XIC X11DRV_FindXIC(HWND hwnd)
+{
+    HWND hwndParent = hwnd;
You can name the parameter hwndParent.

+    XIC ic;
+    if (!hwndParent)
+        return NULL;
+    for (;;)
+    {
+        ic = get_win_data( hwndParent )->xic;
+        if (ic)
+            break;
+        else
+            hwndParent = GetParent(hwnd);
+
+        if (!hwndParent)
+            return NULL;
+    }
Because I'm not an expert at Wine's XIC handling, I wonder whether this
approach is acceptable. Anyway, it's better to rewrite this code snippet
with while loop.

+    return ic;
+}
+
 void X11DRV_ForceXIMReset(HWND hwnd)
 {
-    XIC ic = X11DRV_get_ic(hwnd);
+    XIC ic = X11DRV_FindXIC(hwnd);
     if (ic)
     {
         char* leftover;
@@ -267,7 +294,7 @@ void X11DRV_SetPreeditState(HWND hwnd, BOOL fOpen)
     XIMPreeditState state;
     XVaNestedList attr;
 
-    ic = X11DRV_get_ic(hwnd);
+    ic = X11DRV_FindXIC(hwnd);
     if (!ic)
         return;
 
These code change the preexisting behaviors.
Would you mind dividing this patch into two or more?
e.g.
 - part 1: introduces X11DRV_FindXIC() and updates X11DRV_ForceXIMReset(),
 - part 2: calls X11DRV_FindXIC() in X11DRV_SetPreeditState() (this part
might merge into part 1)
 - part 3: calls X11DRV_ForceXIMRest() in NotifyIME(CPS_COMPLETE).

Akihiro Sagawa