Hello,

Sorry if this was on the wrong list :)

Reverting it would break whatever that patch was supposed to fix.

Implementing the correct behaviour is not the best choice if the rest of the structure suffers functional regressions due to it by not being prepared. I know the 1.7.x versions are development releases but if something is not done its go into the stable release.

This bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 and the latter fix.

2014-07-08 1:21 GMT+01:00 Vincent Povirk <madewokherd@gmail.com>:

This would've been more appropriate on wine-users.

> - If a patch/commit has a bad impact for users why not remove it, especially
> if a possible solution is not accepted?

Reverting it would break whatever that patch was supposed to fix.

> -This summer sale i bought Tomb Raider 2013 on steam just to find the game
> playable only with a patch on bugzilla. Is it only a case of the patch not
> having come through the correct channels.Can it be accepted ? Its not a
> single case.

Which bug and patch are you referring to?