>
> if (sm > 2) handle instruction length
> else if (comment or def instruction) special handling for them
> else skip DWORD with bit 31 set
>
> Is this correct?
>

SM >= 2 for the instruction length case, but apart from that it should be good.

Oups. Tipo. It's what I meant.

Ideally we'd use some tests, as Henri suggested, but that's not
blocking this patch I think.

I'll try to add some of them for that case.