Hum?I don't think you need event log handles to be handled by server,I thought all the HANDLEs are hosted by server.
I'm not sure I follow you here.Anyway, you'll need some plan for all parts involved (advapi32, logging service, something else?) before sending such dead code patches.Hence,I did.It need be hosted by server because you need to distinguish one eventlog from the ohter,any way.
2014年3月2日日曜日、Nikolay Sivov<bunglehead@gmail.com> さんは書きました:
On 3/2/2014 14:13, 中川祥 wrote:
What event log API are you talking about? Why does this handle have to be maintained by a server?Handle for eventlog.It is different from event.It's almost same as hfile,but more info needed.Is it implemented?
2014-03-02 16:19 GMT+09:00 Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead@gmail.com>:
On 3/2/2014 10:44, Akira Nakagawa wrote:
What's that about?