Yes, you should run 'make test' and get no errors after your changes. If you fixed todo it should be removed, if you break existing test you should fix your patch.I think it's already covered byOn Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead@gmail.com> wrote:
Please add some tests for that.On 3/21/2012 08:58, Eric Culp wrote:
The two functions have different return values on windows for analogous inputs.
Changed to match windows behavior.
---
dlls/shlwapi/url.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
dlls/shlwapi/tests/url.c:672
res = pUrlGetPartA("hi", szPart, &dwSize, URL_PART_SCHEME, 0);ok (res==S_FALSE, "UrlGetPartA(\"hi\") returned %08X\n", res);
and
dlls/shlwapi/tests/url.c:685res = pUrlGetPartW(hiW, bufW, &dwSize, URL_PART_SCHEME, 0);todo_wine ok(res==S_OK, "UrlGetPartW(\"hi\") returned %08X\n", res);
Line 686 was the one that previously triggered a todo. Should the todo_wine be removed?