On 11/26/21 1:21 PM, Mohamad Al-Jaf wrote:
Hi Nikolay,

Agreed, it does seem like it should not belong to kernelbase but the function is there in the Windows 10 kernelbase.dll binary.

As far as I know, these dlls are part of an API set. To me, it seems much more efficient if there was a way to integrate them into the core dlls rather than add individual dlls. But I don't know if this is possible at the moment. 

What do you think? Which dll is more appropriate for these functions?

Ideally, we wouldn't be integrating them anywhere. Does it work with just stub entries in api set dll, without forwards?


On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 4:45 AM Nikolay Sivov <nsivov@codeweavers.com> wrote:
I don't think this belongs to kernelbase, same for patch 3/4. Whether we
want internal API at all to accommodate for native dlls is another question.