On Friday, 19 February 2016, Louis Lenders <xerox.xerox2000x@gmail.com> wrote:
>Also I think it's better to do a little bit more and forward them to
>ntdll Rtl* calls, like some existing calls already do, it's safe to
>assume prototype are the same between the two.

Hi Nicolai, RtlAddAuditAccessObjectAce and other are still not implemented in ntdll (and ntdll.spec)
Am i right that you suggest to write the stubs for Rtl* in ntdll, and then forward advapi32 calls to
Rtl* functions?

Yes, same way existing AddAudit* functions do. 
Regards
 Louis