Imho we should keep it like this because it's easier to compare against the Windows IDLs.
I mean we also add a bunch of stuff which basically has no effect but keeps similarity to the original sources, in case MS adds a use to that. Plus, issues with the namespaces could arise in the future. 
(Hope that makes sense.) 

Bernhard

Rémi Bernon <rbernon@codeweavers.com> schrieb am Di., 1. März 2022, 18:46:
On 3/1/22 18:34, Zebediah Figura (she/her) wrote:
> On 3/1/22 10:42, Rémi Bernon wrote:
>> From: Bernhard Kölbl <besentv@gmail.com>
>>
>> And its dependencies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Kölbl <besentv@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Rémi Bernon <rbernon@codeweavers.com>
>> ---
>>
>> v2: Minor alignment tweaking, though how long can these lines be, oof...
>>
>
> Could we omit the fully qualified namespace?
>

Not for everything, only to reference things in the same namespace.

Although it may seem a good idea, and I initially thought as much,
there's a lot of cross-namespace references, and I find that it makes
things less consistent and less readable overall.

--
Rémi Bernon <rbernon@codeweavers.com>