Not if you fix to_double first. Just call VariantChangeType inside to_double, like you did in to_string:On 06/24/14 15:59, Shuai Meng wrote:
2014-06-19 8:30 GMT+08:00 Shuai Meng <mengshuaicalendr@gmail.com>:I have tried to_double, but I don't think it is as convenient as VariantChangeType.
2014-06-17 17:43 GMT+08:00 Jacek Caban <jacek@codeweavers.com>:
On 06/17/14 07:59, Shuai Meng wrote:
> diff --git a/dlls/vbscript/global.c b/dlls/vbscript/global.c
> index c2b2edd..d21784d 100644
> --- a/dlls/vbscript/global.c
> +++ b/dlls/vbscript/global.c
> @@ -1320,8 +1320,24 @@ static HRESULT Global_Int(vbdisp_t *This, VARIANT *arg, unsigned args_cnt, VARIA
>
> static HRESULT Global_Sgn(vbdisp_t *This, VARIANT *arg, unsigned args_cnt, VARIANT *res)
> {
> - FIXME("\n");
> - return E_NOTIMPL;
> + VARIANT v;
> + HRESULT hres;
> +
> + TRACE("(%s)\n", debugstr_variant(arg));
> +
> + assert(args_cnt == 1);
> +
> + V_VT(&v) = VT_EMPTY;
> + hres = VariantChangeType(&v, arg, VARIANT_LOCALBOOL, VT_R8);
> + if (FAILED(hres))
> + return S_OK;
Please use to_double() instead. to_double may need some fixes (it may
require similar changes as you did for to_string first).
Yes, to_double is better and simpler.Jacek
http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/commitdiff/6bef4da592c8be4857dc0fa179a3139835266d3cWell... of course there is no. As the name suggests, the type "empty" is empty and has no values ;) What will be result of converting empty to double is a matter of language semantic and vbscript happens to have the same semantic as VT_EMPTY->VT_R8 conversion in VariantChangeType.
I have to add more types such as VT_CY and VT_EMPTY, and they don't work. For example, if185 switch(V_VT(v)) {186 case VT_EMPTY:187 *ret = VT_EMPTY(v);
but there is no VT_EMPTY(), how can I give ret whose type is double a "EMPTY" value?I'm not saying about giving up VariantChangeType, I just want to use it right.
Why must we pick up to_double and give up VariantChangeType?
Jacek