Hi, all
Thanks for Piotr's comment on my GSOC ideas.
In order to have a good knowledge of functions from tr2 namespace, I had made a test and written some functions' implementation.

However, I had an issue with msvcp test's design when I need to free library of msvcp90 and load msvcp110.
619 static HMODULE msvcr, msvcp;
 620 #define SETNOFAIL(x,y) x = (void*)GetProcAddress(msvcp,y)
 621 #define SET(x,y) do { SETNOFAIL(x,y); ok(x != NULL, "Export '%s' not found\     n", y); } while(0)
In my patch, I use a hmodule variable named msvcp90 to save msvcp90 hmodule and then reuse msvcp to save msvcp110.
As far as I am concerned, the name msvcp90 or msvcp90_saver is not good enough. Could you give it a good name?

And the other method I came up with is  undefining SETNOFAIL and SET and using msvcp110 to define it again, which I think is ugly.
By the way, my crosstest on all the testbots[1] show that msvcp110.dll or msvcrt110.dll not installed.
It seems testbot doesn't install msvcp110.

I will be grateful for any advice you can provide.

[1]: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=12146&log_110=1#k110