Ok, that can probably be done with some linker script magic, since
this is merely a warning in the assembler. I'll take a look at that.

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org> wrote:
> Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com> writes:
>
>> Whether .dynamic is writable depends on the architecture (I believe
>> the only one on which it isn't is MIPS, but I could be wrong about
>> that). Looks like binutils doesn't take that into account when issuing
>> this diagnostic in the assembler and expects .dynamic to have
>> SHF_ALLOC only. Probably something to complain about to them. I don't
>> believe there's an actual problem though, just an incorrect
>> diagnostic.
>
> We don't want to introduce build warnings though, so even if this is a
> binutils bug it would have to be avoided somehow.
>
> --
> Alexandre Julliard
> julliard@winehq.org