On Thu Nov 27 10:24:33 2025 +0000, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
That's another case similar to !6527, where the app ships with an incompatible dll. I don't think loadorder is the right mechanism for that, since the dlls are really different things under the same name. This needs more thought...
I guess we should fix the module loader to prefer DLLs in the same directory as the executable.