Rejected patches needing review.

[Peter Dons Tychsen]

Hello Michael.

Thanks for your input (and Juan and Austin).

> Peter, are you sure that windows will handle REG_SZ *only* in the
> DependOnService case and fail if you have a REG_SZ in DependOnGroup?

No. But i did not want to change the behavior for anything else than the
scenario that i had been investigating and testing, to avoid
regressions. But i am confident that the similar behavior can be found
for DependOnGroup if you look into it. That is another patch however,
which i do not want to mix into this one.

I have re-submitted the patch,

Thanks,

/pedro