January 2002 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

mingw32 port and cygwin
by Steven Edwards 31 Jan '02

31 Jan '02

I'm having a bitch of a time with configure on mingw. I understand not wanting to #ifdef OSNAME in the wine source tree and how this would be a pain if a project forked. Would you be opposed to a #ifdef statement for mingw? Thanks Steven _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

3 4

Compilation errors for Freetype support
by Andriy Palamarchuk 31 Jan '02

31 Jan '02

Trying to compile today's Wine I get errors: freetype.c: In function `WineEngGetGlyphOutline': freetype.c:947: `FT_Angle' undeclared (first use in this function) freetype.c:947: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once freetype.c:947: for each function it appears in.) freetype.c:947: parse error before `angle' freetype.c:993: `angle' undeclared (first use in this function) freetype.c:1003: warning: implicit declaration of function `FT_Vector_Rotate' freetype.c:1059: warning: implicit declaration of function `FT_Cos' freetype.c:1060: warning: implicit declaration of function `FT_Sin' Huw, these functions calls were introduced to the file by your patch, applyed on Jan 29, 2002. I believe the problems are because of differences between freetype versions. The problem occurs on freetype 2.0.1, but according to thread "Prob with freetype..." is fixed after upgrading to 2.0.3. Regards, Andriy Palamarchuk __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com

4 5

RE: New to wine
by Patrik Stridvall 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

> All wine headers seem to declare function pointers like > > <return value> WINAPI (*<function pointer name)(<parameter list>) > > Visual C 5 does not like the WINAPI (eg __stdcall) outside of > the brackets and requires: > > <return value> (WINAPI *<function pointer name>)(<parameter list>) [snip] > Maybe there is someone on this list which can give me an > direct answer to this. If you want to compile with Visual C++ you will have to do something like below. #ifdef __GNUC__ #define WINAPI_PTR * WINAPI #else #define WINAPI_PTR WINAPI * #endif And replace all WINAPI function with: <return value> (WINAPI_PTR <function pointer name>)(<parameter list>) Hmm. That reminds me. I experimented with this some year ago but I have no distinct memory of asking Alexandre whether he wanted a patch that does this for Wine. Then I forgot about it. Alexandre: Will you accept a patch that does this?

2 1

Problems building wrc on mingw
by Steven Edwards 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

bison -y -v -d -t ./parser.y conflicts: 2 shift/reduce gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -g -O2 -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT -o y.tab.o y.tab.c gcc: y.tab.c: No such file or directory gcc: No input files make: *** [y.tab.o] Error 1 I've got the -v option going but I can't get a debug output form bison to figure out whats going wrong. Anyone got any ideas? Thanks Steven _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Current CVS doesn't compile
by Bernhard Rosenkraenzer 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

dlls/Makefile.in refers to msvcrt20, but the directory doesn't exist. Guess someone forgot a "cvs add". LLaP bero -- This message is provided to you under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html

3 2

err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0xXXXXXXX "?" wait timed out, retrying (60sec) fs = XXXX
by Sylvain Petreolle 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

Hi, Like many users now, I have this message when I launch some programs : err:ntdll:RtlpWaitForCriticalSection section 0xXXXXXXX "?" wait timed out, retrying (60sec) fs = XXXX To clear the situtation : What does this message means and what could be done to make it disappear ? Some users have made post with these and have got no response... ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.fr

2 4

New to wine
by Rolf Kalbermatter 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

Hello I happened to find wine when researching some undocumented stuff in shell32.dll for my own shell extensions I had written. It was interesting to see how things may be done in windows. I also identified some parts in the wine shell32 which need more attention and plan to submit some patches concerning that after I have familiarized myself a little more with wine. Since I had no Linux system at my hands I tried to use the Visual C 5 compiler on my windows system to compile the shell32 dll and found some problems with that. Separate from some wine specific project definitions which need to be made for Visual C to process the wine headers Iand which I probably haven't done all properly) there was one problem with function pointer definitions. All wine headers seem to declare function pointers like <return value> WINAPI (*<function pointer name)(<parameter list>) Visual C 5 does not like the WINAPI (eg __stdcall) outside of the brackets and requires: <return value> (WINAPI *<function pointer name>)(<parameter list>) I could also not find any comprehensible ANSI C description which would care to explain what would be the correct way of function pointer declarations with a calling convention identifier. I tried to figure out how this could be solved. Declaring WINAPI to be empty and telling Visual C to use __stdcall as default gives other problems with internal wine functions without explicit calling convention declaration and with a variable argument list, which requires __cdecl. The only way I could find was to adjust the function pointer definitions in the affected headers. Of course this goes quite far and might cause problems with other compilers. As I will soon have a new development machine on which I will install Linux alongside of Windows I can fairly easily check if this would cause problems with gcc, but wine seems to care for more compilers than that and I have no idea if such a change would cause problems (it probably would anyhow :-| ). Maybe there is someone on this list which can give me an direct answer to this. Rolf Kalbermatter

2 1

Prob with freetype...
by Meths 30 Jan '02

30 Jan '02

Hiya, Didn't see anyone mention this so... When compiling CVS tonight... gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -g -O2 -Wall -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -fPIC -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/X11R6/include -o freetype.o freetype.c freetype.c: In function `WineEngGetGlyphOutline': freetype.c:947: `FT_Angle' undeclared (first use in this function) freetype.c:947: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once freetype.c:947: for each function it appears in.) freetype.c:947: parse error before `angle' freetype.c:993: `angle' undeclared (first use in this function) freetype.c:1003: warning: implicit declaration of function `FT_Vector_Rotate' freetype.c:1059: warning: implicit declaration of function `FT_Cos' freetype.c:1060: warning: implicit declaration of function `FT_Sin' make[2]: *** [freetype.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/cvs_root/wine/dlls/gdi' make[1]: *** [gdi/libgdi32.so] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/cvs_root/wine/dlls' make: *** [dlls] Error 2 Compilation failed, aborting install. Meths

2 1

Re: SetEndOfFile fix
by Guy L. Albertelli 29 Jan '02

29 Jan '02

----- Original Message ----- From: <lawson_whitney(a)juno.com> To: <rklazes(a)xs4all.nl>; <galberte(a)neo.lrun.com> Cc: <wine-patches(a)winehq.com> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 4:30 PM Subject: Re: SetEndOfFile fix > On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Rein Klazes wrote: > > > You still need ftruncate in case the file has to shrink. To do that > > without ftruncate takes a lot more work then an lseek and a write. > > > > Rein. > > > Right. I meant sort of like this. Unfortunately I haven't an app that > does this, to be sure I have it right. > > Changelog > server : file.c > Lawson Whitney <lawson_whitney(a)juno.com> > Rein Klazes <rklazes(a)xs4all.nl> > Guy Albertelli <galberte(a)neo.lrun.com> > Do not rely on ftruncate to grow a file. It may refuse or fail > to do so. (eg with vfat filesystem under Linux) > > Outlook Express 5.0 is happy (relatively). Lets commit this. Guy

1 0

RE: Sooo quiet...
by Patrik Stridvall 29 Jan '02

29 Jan '02

> ... I feel like starting a flamewar, just to get some > traffic on this list :) Yes!!! Flamewar!!! No retreat!!! No surrender!!! > Speaking of which, I figured I should rattle Alexandre's cage :) Well, I guess he will have fun with all the outstanding patches. I think he has never had so many. :-) > So here I go: > > Wine's been around for 8 (_eight_) years (how time flies)! It is my > understanding that we're approaching the 1.0 status. I say, > let's change > the versioning scheme, just to give the outside world a feeling of > progress. Really, I think the current scheme kindda hurts us on a PR > level. > > We can start with something like 0.90.0. This should give us plenty > numbers to the upcoming 1.0, don't you think? Unfortunetely there won't be any flamewar as far as I'm concerned since don't care very much either way. :-) But if anybody is intrested in my opinion anyway here goes: I'm slightly against changing the versioning scheme before 1.0. After 1.0 we probably want to have so sort of different versioning especially since we might release different versions of the DLL:s independently of each other. However I don't think there is much use of having that pre 1.0.

8 10