March 2005 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

winsock conformance tests
by gslink 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

I have noted for some time that the winsock in Odin, the OS/2 version of Wine, seems to work better than the one in Wine. This might figure in conformance testing and in Wine updates.

1 0

IBM Acknowledges Wine! Offers bounty to port it to PPC64!
by Scott Ritchie 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

IBM has started a new contest meant to spur open source development on their POWER architecture, http://www.linuxonpower.com/ Prizes are offered for coders that port some common open source applications to the architecture. A Tier 2 prize, a Mac G5, is offered to anyone who can port one of the list of Tier 2 applications. Color me shocked to find Wine and Winelib listed there! This marks a change in IBMs policy towards Wine, or perhaps signals a management oversight. While normally it seems that they have an active policy of censoring any references to Wine and completely denying its existence, here they are offering prizes for porting it to PPC. So, now, I guess, the obvious questions: Does Winelib even need any porting? Does it build on PPC as it is? Can we run notepad and such on Linux/PPC? Does any of the work done on porting to AMD64 help us here? Thanks, Scott Ritchie

5 7

STI, device drivers and stuff
by Damjan Jovanovic 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Hi I've started working on implementing STI functionality in Wine. STI is a Windows 98/2000 "Still Image" capture system, and I'm doing it to get my scanner working in Linux. I have a few questions: 1. Do you support/accept/like C++ code in Wine? COM is bad enough in C++, I would rather not do it in C. 2. STI has kernel mode components to deal USB / SCSI / serial / parallel ports. Is there any attempt to bring kernel mode support into Wine (ReactOS/Wine merger?) any time soon? If not, should I implement USB support using libusb in user-space? 3. Either way, changes need to be made to CreateFile(), CloseHandle(), DeviceIoControl(), ReadFile() and WriteFile() to accomodate this. What's the best way to do this? Do I need to change the Wine server, or just Wine's KERNEL32.DLL and/or NT*.DLL equivalents? 4. Anyone wanna help out? Bye Damjan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

3 4

Re: animate: audit and some fixes
by Tom Wickline 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 07:45:03 -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun <dpaun(a)rogers.com> wrote: > ChangeLog > Audit the control against Comctl32.dll version 6.0. > Proper handling of GWL_STYLE. > Implement WM_CLOSE. Fix WM_SIZE implementation. > Small cleanups. > > Index: dlls/comctl32/animate.c Hello Dimi, Can you update the http://winehq.org/site/status_ui page or do you want me to? Tom

2 1

SetFocus and DefPushButton management
by Katia Maculan 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

After the creation of a dialog if the focus is set on a PushButton this one must have also the BS_DEFPUSHBUTTON style like in windows. Attached the patch with a regression test. Katia -- Katia Maculan Developer ISIS Papyrus Italy Srl Tel: (+39) 0125 6455400 Fax: (+39) 0125 6455400 E-mail: katia.maculan(a)isis-papyrus.com Info: info(a)isis-papyrus.com Hotline: +43-2236-27551-111 Visit our Website: http://www.isis-papyrus.com diff -urN oldwinedir/dlls/user/tests/dialog.c newwinedir/dlls/user/tests/dialog.c --- oldwinedir/dlls/user/tests/dialog.c 2005-03-07 12:12:40.000000000 +0100 +++ newwinedir/dlls/user/tests/dialog.c 2005-03-14 16:33:03.000000000 +0100 @@ -849,6 +849,40 @@ } } +static LRESULT CALLBACK DlgFocusProc (HWND hDlg, UINT message, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam) +{ + HWND hwndFocusCtrl = NULL; + HWND hwndDefPushButton = NULL; + LRESULT DlgCode; + LRESULT CtrlState; + switch (message) + { + case WM_INITDIALOG: + PostMessage(hDlg, WM_USER, 0, 0); + return TRUE; + + case WM_USER: + // Check if the focus is on IDOK button + CtrlState = SendMessage (GetDlgItem(hDlg, IDOK), BM_GETSTATE, 0, 0); + if (CtrlState == BST_FOCUS) + hwndFocusCtrl = GetDlgItem(hDlg, IDOK); + // Check if IDOK is the default push button + DlgCode = SendMessage (GetDlgItem(hDlg, IDOK), WM_GETDLGCODE, 0, 0); + if (DlgCode & DLGC_DEFPUSHBUTTON) + hwndDefPushButton = GetDlgItem(hDlg, IDOK); + ok (hwndFocusCtrl && hwndDefPushButton, "The focus and the DLGC_DEFPUSHBUTTON style are not in the same button\n"); + EndDialog(hDlg, LOWORD(wParam)); + return TRUE; + } + return FALSE; + +} + +static void InitialFocusTest1 (void) +{ + DialogBox(g_hinst, "DEFPUSHBUTTON_TEST_DIALOG", NULL, (DLGPROC)DlgFocusProc); + +} START_TEST(dialog) { @@ -860,4 +894,5 @@ IsDialogMessageWTest(); WM_NEXTDLGCTLTest(); InitialFocusTest(); + InitialFocusTest1(); } diff -urN oldwinedir/windows/dialog.c newwinedir/windows/dialog.c --- oldwinedir/windows/dialog.c 2005-03-07 12:12:54.000000000 +0100 +++ newwinedir/windows/dialog.c 2005-03-14 16:30:19.000000000 +0100 @@ -669,8 +669,23 @@ { /* By returning TRUE, app has requested a default focus assignment */ dlgInfo->hwndFocus = GetNextDlgTabItem( hwnd, 0, FALSE); - if( dlgInfo->hwndFocus ) - SetFocus( dlgInfo->hwndFocus ); + if (dlgInfo->hwndFocus) + { + SetFocus( dlgInfo->hwndFocus ); + HWND hWndOldDefPushButton = NULL; + if (SendMessageW(dlgInfo->hwndFocus, WM_GETDLGCODE, 0, 0) + & (DLGC_UNDEFPUSHBUTTON | DLGC_BUTTON)) + { + SendMessageA (dlgInfo->hwndFocus, BM_SETSTYLE, BS_DEFPUSHBUTTON, TRUE); + /*Check for a previous defpushbutton*/ + if (dlgInfo->idResult) + { + hWndOldDefPushButton = GetDlgItem (hwnd,dlgInfo->idResult); + if (hWndOldDefPushButton && (hWndOldDefPushButton != dlgInfo->hwndFocus)) + SendMessageA (hWndOldDefPushButton, BM_SETSTYLE, BS_PUSHBUTTON, TRUE); + } + } + } } if (template.style & WS_VISIBLE && !(GetWindowLongW( hwnd, GWL_STYLE ) & WS_VISIBLE))

3 2

wine + winamp: fixme:wave:OSS_AddRingMessage two fast messages in the queue!!!!
by seut 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

hello, we are using winamp 2.95 with latest wine 0.0.20040914 and are wondering what there is about these 'fixme:wave:OSS_AddRingMessage two fast messages in the queue!!!!' messages dumped out at the console every few seconds... Same happens(but with 'ALSA_AddRingMessages' of course) if we're using the wine alsa-driver. Winamp normally works, but sometimes there is a 15sec pause at the playback, so we are trying to search the problem. I watched the wine source-code, but as my less C knowledge I didn't really understand the part where this 'FIXME' message is implemented. As I understand the code, why somebody added the 'FIXME' message to the code, if the code can handle this problem(two fast messages)? Or can somebody explain me the reason for this 'two fast messages'? thanks a lot seut btw. I'm not a member of the mailing-list, so please send answer to me too! and please don't suggest us to use a native linux-player instead, for some reasons, we have to use winamp..

2 2

Re: Are mailslots implemented?
by Kuba Ober 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

> |>>Which application uses mailslots? I only ever found one real > |>>application that used them, and that was "Declan's Korean Dictionary" > |>>from [1]. > |> > |>The browse (Network Neighborhood) service uses them. Other then that, > |>I have not seen any uses of it. > | > | Protel 98 (likely higher versions too) uses them. > | > | MSDN says that the datagrams are limited to 424 bytes in length, so > > even if > > | they are not very useful otherwise, getting Protel running on wine > > seems a > > | worthy goal to me. I'll try hacking on it and seeing where I end up. > > See http://www.ubiqx.org/cifs/Browsing.html#BRO.3 for more information > libsmbclient from Samba 3 does not support it at the moment What do the "match_mailslot_name" and "cli_send_mailslot" functions do, then? Anyway, if the wire protocol is simple enough, and so it seems from ubiqx.org article, then I can just synthesize all the relevant layers to send the multicast UDP. The only piece of info that I'll (hopefully) need from wine is the netbios node name. For reception, I'll bind UDP port 138 (netbios-dgm) if it's not already bound, to receive the mailslots coming in. Now, if a samba server is already running on given host, which is reasonable if the person running wine wants to share something with other windows hosts, is it possible to somehow poll the nmbd and/or smbd to get the mailslot datagrams that weren't "consumed" by the browsing protocols? Does that make sense? Any more hints? Cheers, Kuba

7 8

Problem with winebuild
by Robert Lunnon 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

The following problem is evident under solaris NULL pointer passed to printf I'm not sure if this is a poblem with the spec file or winebuild.... Still it's not good to pass NULL pointers to printf Starting program: /export/home/src/wine2004/wine/tools/winebuild/winebuild -w --def -o amstream/amstream.spec.def --export amstream/amstream.spec Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xd2722a6c in strlen () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 (gdb) bt #0 0xd2722a6c in strlen () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #1 0xd2777d3e in _ndoprnt () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xd277a8b7 in fprintf () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1 #3 0x0805d962 in BuildDef32File (outfile=0x8077078, spec=0x8077630) at spec32.c:848 #4 0x08054819 in main (argc=7, argv=0x80477f4) at main.c:469

3 4

Re: dlls/shell32/shelllink.c
by Mike McCormack 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Ge van Geldorp wrote: > I have some shortcuts (created in Windows 2000) which only have 24 bytes of > LOCATION_INFO, i.e. they are missing the dwFinalPathOfs member. > Also lots of shortcuts seem to have another chunk at the end of the stream, > I get a lot of "Last word was not zero" messages. Could you send me a shortcut like that, or even modify winedump (lnk mode) to dump out the right thing in that case? thanks, Mike

2 1

Re: dlls/shell32/shelllink.c (please don't apply)
by Mike McCormack 16 Mar '05

16 Mar '05

Ge van Geldorp wrote: > - ERR("Last word was not zero\n"); > + TRACE("Last word was not zero\n"); btw. the right solution is to fix the problem, not ignore it, so I object to this patch being applied as is. Mike

1 0