March 2008 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

bugzilla patches
by Lei Zhang 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

Hi, Can someone take a look at my bugzilla patches from over a week ago? http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-March/051551.html http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-March/051552.html http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-March/051553.html http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2008-March/051768.html - Lei

2 1

Fwd: Questions regarding Summer of Code( and Dplay)
by Anurag Mishra 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anurag Mishra <mishra.anurag07(a)gmail.com> Date: Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:30 AM Subject: Re: Questions regarding Summer of Code( and Dplay) To: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst(a)gmail.com> Hi, I have already compiled git version and am learning the basics of using git now. Someone on irc suggested to first write test cases about the functions in wine(that may be missing) and crosscheck on windows. Right now, I am looking to start in that direction. Thanks, Anurag. On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Anurag, > > 2008/3/19, Anurag Mishra <mishra.anurag07(a)gmail.com>: > > > > I am student at IIT Kanpur[1]. I have quite good knowledge about C > > and have been tracking development of Wine over a period of 6 months > > or so. I have good knowledge about C(and using it theoretically to > > implement stacks, efficient structures and so on). However, I have > > little real life experience about programming a project. I have little > > experience about Window's API. > > I was looking to participate in Wine development this summer. On SoC > > page, the idea of Dplay was bought up. I am interested in trying hands > > on that. Can anyone suggest what would be a good starting point? > > There are only a few important things to directplay as far as I know. > The first one is find a game that runs in wine and uses it, and works > reasonably well single player but not at all multiplayer or online > because of the missing things (fixmes on dplay in console). After you > played the game a little bit, think of a plan on how you want to > tackle this problem. > > Have you managed to compile a git version of wine yet? > > Cheers, > Maarten. >

1 0

Re: winex11.drv: Don't add owned windows to the taskbar
by Alexandre Julliard 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

Dmitry Timoshkov <dmitry(a)codeweavers.com> writes: > this patch fixes the bug 12160. According to my tests explorer in XP > doesn't add owned windows to the taskbar. Do we really want to remove them from the pager too? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Appdb request: allow browsing for downloadable platinum apps
by Dan Kegel 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

The appdb has a "browse by rating" and a "browse downloadable" option, but there's no way to combine them. Can we add a 'downloadable' checkbox in the 'browse by rating' page, maybe?

3 2

Re: [Bug 9484] Program refuses to run because of ProtectCD/ ProtectDISC copy-protection
by James Hawkins 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

On 3/24/08, wine-bugs(a)winehq.org <wine-bugs(a)winehq.org> wrote: > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9484 > > > --- Comment #9 from Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> 2008-03-24 12:43:54 --- > Can anyone test this in wine 0.9.58? Some other copy protections are working > better, and if this isn't working yet, we might want to delay it to wine 1.2... > What's the point of having a blocker list if we keep deferring those bugs? Granted not every bug in the list deserves a spot, but we need to knuckle down and get these bugs fixed. When we get closer to the release date, we can get a better idea of which bugs are not feasible to fix before the release. Until that point, this bug list needs to receive top priority. -- James Hawkins

2 2

Re: Download.template: Update PC-BSD download link and icon [Resend]
by James Hawkins 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

On 3/24/08, Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Not sure why it wasn't applied the first time. Didn't receive any > comments on it. Anywho, in case it was accidently sent to /dev/null, > here it is again. Fixes bug 12095. > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12095 > No patch attached. -- James Hawkins

1 0

wineasio: source now hosted on SourceForge
by Peter L Jones 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

I thought I'd post here to let interested parties know that the various strands of source for wineasio have been brought together in a single SourceForge project. After a great deal of thought, the project name "wineasio" was chosen by unanimous vote (okay, so only I got a say...). Robert Reif and the early JackLab code branches are both preserved with change history. The trunk is wineasio-0.7.x, which is under "active" development. Bug reports, feature requests, offers of help and code via the SF project trackers, please. Let me know your SF.net ID if you want to commit to the project (and show some code...). Thanks, -- Peter http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/wineasio

1 0

Re: kernel32: WideCharToMultiByte: return error on negative dest len
by Alexandre Julliard 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

"Dan Kegel" <dank(a)kegel.com> writes: > +static void test_negative_dest_length(void) > +{ > + int len; > + char buf[10]; > + > + /* Test return on negative dest length */ > + SetLastError( 0xdeadbeef ); > + memset(buf,'x',sizeof(buf)); > + len = WideCharToMultiByte(CP_ACP, 0, foobarW, -1, buf, -1, NULL, NULL); > + ok(len == 0 && GetLastError() == ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, > + "WideCharToMultiByte(destlen -1): len=%d error=%x\n", len, GetLastError()); If you want to determine the behavior for negative values you have to test more than just -1, it may well be special. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

3 2

Confusing SOCKET and int in netapi32
by Juan Lang 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

Hi, commit 63504e9e80acb35666f8689526c67dd99c4fb3ba (janitorial: Use poll() instead of select().) appears to confuse the use of a SOCKET with an int: #include "winsock2.h" #include "windef.h" @@ -302,13 +311,12 @@ static UCHAR NetBTWaitForNameResponse(const NetBTAdapter *adapter, SOCKET fd, while (!found && ret == NRC_GOODRET && (now = GetTickCount()) < waitUntil) { DWORD msToWait = waitUntil - now; - struct fd_set fds; - struct timeval timeout = { msToWait / 1000, msToWait % 1000 }; + struct pollfd pfd; int r; - FD_ZERO(&fds); - FD_SET(fd, &fds); - r = select(fd + 1, &fds, NULL, NULL, &timeout); + pfd.fd = fd; + pfd.events = POLLIN; + r = poll(&pfd, 1, msToWait); I can't imagine how this could work. Notice that netapi32 is linked against ws2_32, includes winsock2.h, and that fd is a SOCKET. Could this part of the commit be reverted, please? --Juan

2 2

Re: [PATCH 01/45] [WinHelp]: now setting the text Window as a richedit one
by Alexandre Julliard 24 Mar '08

24 Mar '08

Eric Pouech <eric.pouech(a)orange.fr> writes: > - all popups are now of MainWindow kind (and embed a richedit control) > > A+ > --- > > programs/winhelp/string.c | 1 > programs/winhelp/winhelp.c | 932 ++------------------------------------------ > programs/winhelp/winhelp.h | 42 -- > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 935 deletions(-) This seems to break the text window pretty badly, the window is now completely blank with just a blinking caret. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0