November 2010 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

PGP key signing party at WineConf
by Shachar Shemesh 08 Nov '10

08 Nov '10

Hi all, During WineConf we will be holding a key signing party, organized by your truly. The wiki page for WineConf has been updated with details on how to participate, and I have set up a page explaining the process for people who have never participated before. Please email your keys to me, with the subject "WineConf key signing" (so that my spam filters don't eat it up). The wineconf wiki page, in case you are not up to date, is at http://wiki.winehq.org/WineConf2010 The key signing page is at http://wiki.winehq.org/KeySigningParty Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Lingnu Open Source Consulting Ltd. http://www.lingnu.com

2 2

Strange test bot results
by Eric Pouech 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Hi Ge, how come I got two different test results for the same patch ? moreover one is perfectly ok, while the other shows strange results any idea ? A+ -- Eric Pouech "The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of a complete idiot." (Douglas Adams)

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/6] [Msvcrt*]: now using the macros for parameter checking for wcsncat_s (and fixed the test)
by Marvin 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6861 Your paranoid android. === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:307: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:315: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:324: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:333: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:342: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:352: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:362: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:307: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:315: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:324: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:333: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:342: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:352: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:362: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === WVISTAADM (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:307: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:315: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:324: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:333: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:342: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:352: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:362: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W2K8SE (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:307: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:315: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:324: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:333: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:342: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:352: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:362: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W7PRO (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:307: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:315: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:324: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:333: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:342: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:352: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:362: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W7PROX64 (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:307: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:315: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:324: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:333: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:342: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:352: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:362: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W7PROX64 (64 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:307: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:315: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:324: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:333: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:342: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:352: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:362: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/6] [Msvcrt]: now using macro for parameters validation itoa_s (and updated the tests as well)
by Marvin 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6859 Your paranoid android. === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:306: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:314: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:323: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:332: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:341: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:351: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:361: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:306: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:314: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:323: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:332: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:341: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:351: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:361: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === WVISTAADM (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:306: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:314: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:323: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:332: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:341: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:351: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:361: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W2K8SE (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:306: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:314: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:323: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:332: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:341: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:351: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:361: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W7PRO (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:306: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:314: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:323: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:332: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:341: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:351: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:361: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W7PROX64 (32 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:306: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:314: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:323: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:332: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:341: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:351: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:361: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 === W7PROX64 (64 bit msvcr90) === msvcr90.c:306: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:314: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:323: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:332: Test failed: Expected errno to be EINVAL, got 9 msvcr90.c:341: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:351: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9 msvcr90.c:361: Test failed: Expected errno to be ERANGE, got 9

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] quartz: Fix PullPin_EnumMediaTypes
by Erich Hoover 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Is there some reason you chose to add an additional function for this, rather than fill in pPinImpl->pin.pFuncsTable? I ask because I was working on this issue last night and submitted an attachment to Bug #24782 for people to try: http://bugs2.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=31770 Erich Hoover ehoover(a)mines.edu

2 1

Re: [PATCH 3/4] mshtml: Added IDispatchEx support to HTMLStyleSheetsCollection object.
by Marvin 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6856 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit dom) === dom.c:3607: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F54A-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} === W7PRO (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5854: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F547-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} dom.c:3607: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F54A-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} === W7PROX64 (32 bit dom) === dom.c:5854: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F547-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} dom.c:3607: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F54A-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} === W7PROX64 (64 bit dom) === dom.c:5854: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F547-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} dom.c:3607: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F54A-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B}

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] mshtml: Added IOmNavigator::get_plugins implementation.
by Marvin 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6855 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit dom) === dom.c:3607: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F54A-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} === W7PRO (32 bit dom) === dom.c:3607: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F54A-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} === W7PROX64 (32 bit dom) === dom.c:3607: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F54A-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B} === W7PROX64 (64 bit dom) === dom.c:3607: Test failed: unexpected guid {3050F54A-98B5-11CF-BB82-00AA00BDCE0B}

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] comctl32/tests: Change toolbar size test data to load dynamically.
by Alexandre Julliard 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

Austin Lund <austin.lund(a)gmail.com> writes: > +static void init_tbsize_results(void) { > + tbsize_results = (tbsize_result_t *)HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, 24*sizeof(tbsize_result_t)); > + tbsize_results[0] = (tbsize_result_t) { {0, 0, 672, 26}, {100, 22}, 5, { > + { 0, 2, 23, 24}, { 23, 2, 46, 24}, { 46, 2, 54, 24}, > + { 54, 2, 77, 24}, { 77, 2, 100, 24} } }; That syntax is not portable, please avoid it. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

3 2

Re: [PATCH 5/5] d3dcompiler_43/tests: Added trigonometric function tests to HLSL test suite
by Henri Verbeet 07 Nov '10

07 Nov '10

On 2 November 2010 07:20, Travis Athougies <iammisc(a)gmail.com> wrote: > +/* Repeatedly call a shader 32 times with linearly varying values and test the results against > + an array of floats using the given epsilon */ Why can't this just use the existing framework?

2 1

Re: jscript: Added Date.setYear stub implementation.
by Marvin 06 Nov '10

06 Nov '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=6844 Your paranoid android. === W98SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAADM (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0