July 2010 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 7/7] msvcp90/tests: Added char_traits<char>::_Copy_s tests
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3549 Your paranoid android. === W7PROX64 (64 bit misc) === Timeout

1 0

My sincerest sincerest apologies
by Misha Koshelev 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Dear All: I am very very sorry for the spam I have created via my testbot failures. I have struggled quite a bit merging my git repository with upstream Wine today. In fact, when I generated individual patches using git-format-patch from my GitHub repository and then used git-am on the corresponding single files, the patches applied successfully. In fact, I just tried this and they still do. However, for some reason, when I generate a patchset to stdout with git-format-patch rather than individual patches, and then use git-am to apply the resulting file to wine-git, the patches no longer apply. I will investigate this further. Additionally, as I seem to find proper patch difficult at the moment, and have now acquired a winetestbot account, I will, in the future, run my patches through testbot first until I am able to work out the process. Further, I have made some edits regarding merging with GitHub at: wiki.winehq.org/WineGit I will update these comments as I figure out why I was not able to rebase/merge successfully. In any case, I appreciate very much your patience with me as I work these git issues out, and hope that my documentation of my experiences on the Wiki will, in the future, help others who may want to contribute to Wine during a code freeze and do so through the GitHub system. Thank you and my sincerest apologies. Yours Misha P.s. I am looking very much forward to finally meeting some of you at WineConf.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3dx9: Test raw vertex data for D3DXCreateSphere.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3542 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3dx9: Test raw vertex data for D3DXCreateSphere.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3542 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] d3dx9: Add tests for D3DXCreateSphere vertex buffer description.
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3541 Your paranoid android. === WINEBUILD (build) === Patch failed

1 0

Re: [2/2] fusion: Implement IAssemblyNameImpl_GetDisplayName more completely
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3538 Your paranoid android. === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit asmname) === asmname.c:738: Test failed: Expected "wine, processorArchitecture=x86", got "wine" asmname.c:739: Test failed: Expected 32, got 5 asmname.c:751: Test failed: Expected "wine, processorArchitecture=AMD64", got "wine" asmname.c:752: Test failed: Expected 34, got 5 asmname.c:764: Test failed: Expected "wine, processorArchitecture=IA64", got "wine" asmname.c:765: Test failed: Expected 33, got 5 asmname.c:777: Test failed: Expected "wine, processorArchitecture=MSIL", got "wine" asmname.c:778: Test failed: Expected 33, got 5

1 0

Re: shlwapi/tests: Fix GLE for SHFormatDateTimeA
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3535 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:593: Test failed: GetShellSecurityDescriptor should fail ordinal.c:616: Test failed: returned value is not valid SD No test summary line found === W7PRO (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1760: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1766: Test failed: got 26 ordinal.c:1781: Test failed: got 10 ordinal.c:1794: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1802: Test failed: got 13 ordinal.c:1816: Test failed: got 26 ordinal.c:1824: Test failed: got 26 ordinal.c:1832: Test failed: got 38, length 39 ordinal.c:1843: Test failed: got 41 ordinal.c:1854: Test failed: got 23 ordinal.c:1865: Test failed: got 26 === W7PROX64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1760: Test failed: got 9 ordinal.c:1781: Test failed: got 6 ordinal.c:1794: Test failed: got 9 ordinal.c:1802: Test failed: got 9 ordinal.c:1832: Test failed: got 32, length 33 ordinal.c:1843: Test failed: got 35 ordinal.c:1854: Test failed: got 19 ordinal.c:1865: Test failed: got 22 === W7PROX64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1760: Test failed: got 9 ordinal.c:1781: Test failed: got 6 ordinal.c:1794: Test failed: got 9 ordinal.c:1802: Test failed: got 9 ordinal.c:1832: Test failed: got 32, length 33 ordinal.c:1843: Test failed: got 35 ordinal.c:1854: Test failed: got 19 ordinal.c:1865: Test failed: got 22

1 0

Re: ntdll: also parse asmv1 assemblies (with test)
by testbot＠testbot.winehq.org 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=3533 Your paranoid android. === WXPPROSP3 (32 bit actctx) === actctx.c:603: Test failed: handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, error 14001 === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit actctx) === actctx.c:603: Test failed: handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, error 14001 === WVISTAADM (32 bit actctx) === actctx.c:603: Test failed: handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, error 14001 === W2K8SE (32 bit actctx) === actctx.c:603: Test failed: handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, error 14001 === W7PRO (32 bit actctx) === actctx.c:603: Test failed: handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, error 14001 === W7PROX64 (32 bit actctx) === actctx.c:603: Test failed: handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, error 14001 === W7PROX64 (64 bit actctx) === actctx.c:603: Test failed: handle == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, error 14001

1 0

Quick license question for teapot
by Misha Koshelev 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Dear All: Sorry to bother - apparently Owen Rudge has done quite a bit of basic texture work, so I will await his patches to start my texture work. As for teapot, Henri recommends looking at freeglut. I know wine is: http://www.winehq.org/license GPL 2.1 Freeglut is "freeglut is released under the X-Consortium license." http://freeglut.sourceforge.net/index.php#download Just wanted to double check if these are compatible. Thx Misha

4 4

MS compatible interface to xulrunner?
by Thomas Kaltenbrunner 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Hello, I am interested to port the wine interface to the xulrunner back to mswindows to access the xulrunner via a IE compatible interface. So it would be easy to replace an embedded IE with the gecko-engine. After some code browsing I thing it will be some of the "DLLs", especially mshtml and shdocvw. I just wanted to hear from you an opinion about that project. What will be the main changes to the wine code - besides renaming of the dlls? Where do you see problems? Did somebody else worked on that or implemented it already? Thanks Thomas Kaltenbrunner -- OPC® cardsystems GmbH Mobil: +49 151 52628082 Skype: tj-opc Zentrale: +49 651 8408 0 Geschäftsführer: Torsten Hülsmann, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Klaus Dieter Schömer Registergericht: Amtsgericht Wittlich HRB-Nr.: 3903

3 3