August 2011 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: ieframe: Moved WebBrowser object tests to ieframe
by Marvin 02 Aug '11

02 Aug '11

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13166 Your paranoid android. === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit ie) === ie.c:61: Test failed: Could not create InternetExplorer instance: 80040154 ie: unhandled exception c0000005 at 004012F2 === WNT4WSSP6 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:3046: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3046: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3046: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3046: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 webbrowser.c:3122: Test failed: Creating WebBrowser object failed: 80040154 === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit webbrowser) === webbrowser.c:2439: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2443: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2444: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:2053: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2054: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2058: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2059: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2439: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2443: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2444: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:378: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETDOWNLOADSTATE_0 webbrowser.c:2053: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2054: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2058: Test failed: put_Resizable failed: 80004001 webbrowser.c:2059: Test failed: expected Invoke_WINDOWSETRESIZABLE webbrowser.c:2439: Test failed: expected GetOverridesKeyPath webbrowser.c:2443: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2444: Test failed: expected Invoke_FILEDOWNLOAD webbrowser.c:431: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:929: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:479: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:929: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:479: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2589: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2709: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2710: Test failed: expected Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:2711: Test failed: expected Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:2717: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:2541: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:761: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:777: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_BEFORENAVIGATE2 webbrowser.c:784: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:576: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:576: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:583: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:587: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1479: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:327: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:761: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:761: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:761: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:761: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_PROPERTYCHANGE webbrowser.c:431: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:431: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:929: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:479: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:862: Test failed: ReadyState = 1, expected 4 webbrowser.c:1490: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:929: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:479: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2589: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:3082: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:576: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:576: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERMODE webbrowser.c:579: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_DLCONTROL webbrowser.c:583: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_USERAGENT webbrowser.c:587: Test failed: unexpected call Invoke_AMBIENT_PALETTE webbrowser.c:1479: Test failed: unexpected call GetOptionKeyPath webbrowser.c:327: Test failed: unexpected call QueryStatus_SETPROGRESSTEXT webbrowser.c:431: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 26 webbrowser.c:431: Test failed: unexpected nCmdID 29 webbrowser.c:929: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:479: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:1490: Test failed: unexpected call GetDropTarget webbrowser.c:929: Test failed: unexpected call GetContainer webbrowser.c:479: Test failed: unexpected call webbrowser.c:2582: Test failed: expected TranslateUrl webbrowser.c:2589: Test failed: expected Invoke_SETSECURELOCKICON webbrowser.c:2802: Test failed: expected RequestUIActivate webbrowser.c:2894: Test failed: Got 0x80004002 webbrowser.c:3089: Test failed: doc != doc2 webbrowser.c:2989: Test failed: QueryService failed: 80004002 webbrowser: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0040B512

2 1

Re: [PATCH] user32: GetMenuItemRect works without draw if the menu isn't a popup
by Andy Clayton 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

On Aug 1, 2011 10:25 AM, "Alexandre Julliard" <julliard(a)winehq.org> wrote: > > Andy Clayton <q3aiml(a)gmail.com> writes: > > > + itemMenu = MENU_GetMenu(hMenu); > > + if (itemMenu == NULL) > > + return FALSE; > > + > > + if ((itemMenu->Height == 0 || itemMenu->Width == 0) && itemMenu->wFlags ^ MF_POPUP) > > That flag test doesn't make sense. What are you trying to check here? > I am trying to check is if it is a menu bar, because in that case GetMenuItemRect works so long as the menu is attached to a window (according to MSDN, anyways). Is there a better way I should be checking this? I guess I overlooked MF_SYSMENU. I also now see that I should instead be calling MenuBarCalcSize, and that my testing has found it returning values even if not attached via SetMenu, though maybe they are not meaningful. Clearly I need to take a second look at this. Sorry for so many mistakes. Andy

1 0

Re: [PATCH] user32: GetMenuItemRect works without draw if the menu isn't a popup
by Alexandre Julliard 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Andy Clayton <q3aiml(a)gmail.com> writes: > + itemMenu = MENU_GetMenu(hMenu); > + if (itemMenu == NULL) > + return FALSE; > + > + if ((itemMenu->Height == 0 || itemMenu->Width == 0) && itemMenu->wFlags ^ MF_POPUP) That flag test doesn't make sense. What are you trying to check here? -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: net: The service dependency messages take a Unicode string as a parameter.
by Alexandre Julliard 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Francois Gouget <fgouget(a)free.fr> writes: > Update the corresponding translations. It would be better to use Unicode printfs everywhere. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

wine crashtests
by Vitaly Perov 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Is it possible to add a test to show that Wine crashes?

3 7

NtQuerySystemInformation needs a little bit more flesh for SystemProcessorPerformanceInformation
by Paul Vriens 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Hi, I was trying out the latest SysInternals Process Explorer and it struck me that the overall CPU % stayed at 0. Adding some values to the sppi structure fixed this but I'm just wondering what values to use: sppi[cpus-1].Reserved1[0].QuadPart = (ULONGLONG)remainder[0] * 10000000 / clk_tck; This Reserved1[0] is the DPC Time but I'm wondering what values from /proc/stat to use here (remainder[0] is I/O wait). We could always make up something of course but being accurate would be nicer. -- Cheers, Paul.

2 2

Re: Re: riched20/tests: fix test_EM_FINDWORDBREAK comments
by Marvin 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=13103 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAADM (32 bit editor) === Failure running script in VM: The specified guest user must be logged in interactively to perform this operation

1 0

Re: riched20/tests: fix test_EM_FINDWORDBREAK comments
by Austin English 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Forgot patch. On Jul 31, 2011 10:20 PM, "Dan Kegel" <dank(a)kegel.com> wrote: > In test_EM_FINDWORDBREAK_[WA], the descriptions of u+f020 and u+ff20 > were mixed up. > Fix that, and clean up a couple others slightly. > >

1 0