April 2013 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

[GSOC 2013] Tools - Implement new control panel applets
by Kaiyi Zhang 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

I'm Kaiyi Zhang,A Computer Science and Engineering student from Civil Aviation University of China.I hear the GSOC and I'm very Interested in this,I look through many projects until i see the "Tools - Implement new control panel applets". I have used wine for a long time,it's very useful and i love it,it is the first time i apply for the GSOC. when i see the wine is also in the list,i decide to contribute to the wine ,i have learned the c program language which required to this project, but i know the more things i need to learn..I have confidence in doing this well,one of my best technologies is using the internet ,search the information i want.. I send for this email to see if i'm on the right track. Look forward to you reply,Thanks for reading..

2 2

Re: [PATCH] kernel32: Fixed string comparision for non-canonical locale identifiers such as zh_CN VS zh-Hans on OS X.
by Ken Thomases 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

On Apr 29, 2013, at 3:41 PM, Qian Hong wrote: > Thanks Ken for many helps! You're welcome and, regarding the patch: looks good to me. -Ken

1 0

Re: [AppDB]: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers
by Joerg Schiermeier 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

Hi list, > Forced moderation of comments could work for apps with maintainers > who are doing their job, but most of the spam I recently deleted was > in unmaintained apps. This will be the first step towards a better maintained AppDB! > My suggestion would be to block comments > altogether on unmaintained apps, not just because of spam, but > because of other inappropriate things that are not being monitored, > such as posting links to illegal downloads. For me it seems to be a got idea to get the maintainers more in charge also to everything around their maintained applications. I general I would like to have this submitted patch in the actual AppDB. And if it is so bad for some maintainers, they might start a new discussion here.. Thanks to all who did some work when creating an patch and wrote some issues here! -- Kindly regards Joerg Schiermeier Bielefeld/Germany

1 0

Re: opengl32: add a test for WGL_EXT_swap_control [try 2]
by Ken Thomases 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Roderick Colenbrander wrote: > Updated version of the patch which marks the failing test as todo_wine. The > final goal is to make the swap interval in the winex11 driver not global > anymore (and store it with the drawable) and add some new functionality. > <0001-opengl32-add-a-test-for-WGL_EXT_swap_control.patch> For what it's worth, the Mac driver does it (apparently) wrong but in the other way. In the Mac driver, the swap interval is currently part of the context state, so not part of the drawable. But it's definitely not global. -Ken

1 0

Re: opengl32: add a test for WGL_EXT_swap_control
by Alexandre Julliard 29 Apr '13

29 Apr '13

Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> writes: > From 1a9ce7c13bef6e600bc9893f93da8770c8fc7767 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Roderick Colenbrander <thunderbird2k(a)gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:39:28 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] opengl32: add a test for WGL_EXT_swap_control > > --- > dlls/opengl32/tests/opengl.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+) It doesn't work here: ../../../tools/runtest -q -P wine -M opengl32.dll -T ../../.. -p opengl32_test.exe.so opengl.c && touch opengl.ok opengl.c:1584: Test failed: Expected swap interval 1, got 0 make[1]: *** [opengl.ok] Error 1 -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: [AppDB] version: Only display comments section in case version has maintainers
by Rosanne DiMesio 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

> > So volunteer to be a maintainer. > > > > > That is all good and well, but most of the time I check the wine page > before I buy a game. If there are no maintainers and this is active, > there will be no comments, I will be unsure about the likelihood of it > working. Reports would still be helpful, but most of the time, the > majority of the information ends up in the comments section. > All the more reason to disable comments. The information belongs in test reports. Comments get deleted periodically, test reports don't. -- Rosanne DiMesio <dimesio(a)earthlink.net>

1 0

[AppDB]: Recent UCE/Spam waves in AppDBs comments
by Joerg Schiermeier 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

Hi list, hello Rosanne, I just saw again a lot of spam posted into the AppDB. Thanks to Rosanne who deleted this senseless and useless mails rapidly. But isn't there a real solution for this problem? OK, to kill this guys maybe the best way, but than I will get seriously problems. :-) So please, isn't there a way to set up a filter - for user names or, with more effect, for IPs of this bad guys ISPs? I know, this will cause 'collateral damage' but if it helps to prevent the next wave of spam - I think it's OK. This maybe a task for AppDBs administrator, isn't it? -- Kindly regards Joerg Schiermeier Bielefeld/Germany

2 1

Re: winex11.drv: Fixed XInput2 errors with mislabeled mice axis.
by Dmitry Timoshkov 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

"Cope, Christopher Edward" <ccope3(a)utk.edu> wrote: > @@ -1638,16 +1636,14 @@ static void X11DRV_RawMotion( XGenericEventCookie *xev ) > if (XIMaskIsSet( event->valuators.mask, class->number )) > { > double val = *values++; > - if (class->label == x11drv_atom( Rel_X ) || > - (!class->label && class->number == 0 && class->mode == XIModeRelative)) > + if (class->label == x11drv_atom( Rel_X ) || class->mode == XIModeRelative) > { > input.u.mi.dx = dx = val; > if (class->min < class->max) > input.u.mi.dx = val * (virtual_screen_rect.right - virtual_screen_rect.left) > / (class->max - class->min); > } > - else if (class->label == x11drv_atom( Rel_Y ) || > - (!class->label && class->number == 1 && class->mode == XIModeRelative)) > + else if (class->label == x11drv_atom( Rel_Y ) || class->mode == XIModeRelative) > { > input.u.mi.dy = dy = val; > if (class->min < class->max) How is this supposed to distinguish motion in X and Y direction? -- Dmitry.

1 0

Re: qedit/tests: Improve test messages
by Marvin 27 Apr '13

27 Apr '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25328 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:149: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401588 === W2K8SE (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:149: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401588

1 0

Re: qedit/tests: Improve test messages
by Marvin 27 Apr '13

27 Apr '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25328 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:149: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401588 === W2K8SE (32 bit mediadet) === mediadet.c:149: Test failed: CoCreateInstance failed: 80040154 mediadet: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00401588

1 0