May 2013 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Release plans
by Alexandre Julliard 27 May '13

27 May '13

Folks, Now that the Mac driver is fully merged and all the bugs fixed (right?), it's time to think about the next stable release. I would like to start the code freeze after the next release cycle, so two weeks from now. Hopefully, like last time we can keep the freeze period relatively short, so that it won't impact the Summer of Code projects too much. Note that in general, new test cases can be accepted during code freeze, and it's always a good idea to start a GSoC project by writing tests. On a related note, the test results on test.winehq.org haven't been looking very good lately; in particular, we need to make the full test suite succeed on the new testbot VMs, since the old ones are being phased out. Fixes to make tests succeed on Windows can go in during code freeze, since by definition they don't impact the Wine code, so this would be a good opportunity to try to improve the situation. OTOH the regression status is looking good, I'm very pleased with how we've kept the regression count under control during the 1.5 series. Hopefully we can even fix a few more during code freeze and set a lower baseline for the next development series. Thanks all for your help, and let's make this another great release! -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

1 0

Re: winmm: load winealsa if winepulse is found
by cfsworks＠gmail.com 27 May '13

27 May '13

Wouldn't this cause applications which use winmm for waveout to be diverted to ALSA as well? Maybe both drivers should be loaded side by side, with winepulse handling everything but MIDI.

1 0

Re: [PATCH v23] winepulse: add pulseaudio driver
by Marvin 27 May '13

27 May '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25724 Your paranoid android. === WVISTAX64 (32 bit render) === render.c:520: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:527: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:586: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:599: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample += 1 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:616: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wBitsPerSample=256 returned 00000000 00000000 === W2K8SE (32 bit render) === render.c:520: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:527: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:586: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:599: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample += 1 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:616: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wBitsPerSample=256 returned 00000000 00000000 === W7PROX64 (32 bit render) === render.c:520: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:527: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:586: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:599: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample += 1 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:616: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wBitsPerSample=256 returned 88890008 00000000 === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit render) === render.c:520: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:527: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:586: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample=0 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:599: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample += 1 returned 88890008 00000000 render.c:616: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wBitsPerSample=256 returned 88890008 00000000 === WVISTAX64 (64 bit render) === render.c:520: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:527: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:586: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:599: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample += 1 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:616: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wBitsPerSample=256 returned 00000000 0000000000000000 === W7PROX64 (64 bit render) === render.c:520: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:527: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:586: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:599: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample += 1 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:616: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wBitsPerSample=256 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit render) === render.c:520: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:527: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with nAvgBytesPerSec=0 and nBlockAlign=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:586: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample=0 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:599: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wValidBitsPerSample += 1 returned 88890008 0000000000000000 render.c:616: Test failed: Shared IsFormatSupported with wBitsPerSample=256 returned 88890008 0000000000000000

1 0

Making SetThreadPriorityBoost claim success
by Dan Kegel 27 May '13

27 May '13

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280 just got another dup. How awful would it be to make SetThreadPriorityBoost just return success, as in the patch attached to http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22280#c1 http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=27224&action=diff&context=patch&co… ? We'd have to mark one more test TODO_WINE. Related if catty discussion: http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/thread-priorities-are-evil.html

2 1

Re: [PATCH 4/5] d3drm: Avoid LPDIRECT3DRMTEXTURE.
by Christian Costa 27 May '13

27 May '13

Le 27/05/2013 09:22, Henri Verbeet a écrit : > --- > dlls/d3drm/d3drm.c | 20 ++++++++------------ > dlls/d3drm/frame.c | 22 +++++++--------------- > dlls/d3drm/meshbuilder.c | 14 +++++++------- > dlls/d3drm/tests/d3drm.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > include/d3drm.h | 4 ++-- > include/d3drmobj.h | 26 +++++++++++++------------- > 6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/d3drm/d3drm.c b/dlls/d3drm/d3drm.c > index 8dfa4bb..fe728a8 100644 > --- a/dlls/d3drm/d3drm.c > +++ b/dlls/d3drm/d3drm.c > @@ -317,24 +317,20 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI IDirect3DRMImpl_CreateUserVisual(IDirect3DRM* iface, D3DRM > return E_NOTIMPL; > } > > -static HRESULT WINAPI IDirect3DRMImpl_LoadTexture(IDirect3DRM* iface, const char* filename, > - LPDIRECT3DRMTEXTURE* Texture) > +static HRESULT WINAPI IDirect3DRMImpl_LoadTexture(IDirect3DRM *iface, > + const char *filename, IDirect3DRMTexture **texture) > { > - IDirect3DRMImpl *This = impl_from_IDirect3DRM(iface); > - > - FIXME("(%p/%p)->(%s,%p): stub\n", iface, This, filename, Texture); > + FIXME("iface %p, filename %s, texture %p stub!\n", iface, debugstr_a(filename), texture); > > Do you really need to change the way traces are displayed?

2 6

Re: jscript: Added RegExp.toString() implementation.
by Marvin 27 May '13

27 May '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25722 Your paranoid android. === W2KPROSP4 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPPROSP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K3R2SESP2 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W2K8SE (32 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === WXPX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === WVISTAX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === W7PROX64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === TEST64_W7SP1 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: riched20: Added tests for ITextDocument::Open
by Alexandre Julliard 27 May '13

27 May '13

Jactry Zeng <jactry92(a)gmail.com> writes: > diff --git a/dlls/riched20/tests/test.txt b/dlls/riched20/tests/test.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e69de29 If you need an external file you have to create a temp file in the test. You can't rely on running from inside the source tree. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 1

Spam again ...
by Joerg Schiermeier 26 May '13

26 May '13

Hi maintainer, ---<cite>--- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 01:07:06 +0000 (UTC) From: xerox_xerox2000(a)yahoo.co.uk To: <wine-devel(a)winehq.org>, <vidar268(a)yahoo.com>, <vladdy(a)utchat.com> Subject: RE: Message-ID: <823277.37895.bm(a)smtp104.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> Moussoiddik%20Aboudou588 http://fonio-bio.org/w/87Elsie%20Mills045 Mon, 27 May 2013 5:04:06 ---</cite>--- UCE/Spam again in this list ...! Please remove this user. Thanks a lot. -- Kindly regards Joerg Schiermeier Bielefeld/Germany

2 1

d3dx9: Avoid useless computations in D3DXMatrixTransformation2D
by Nozomi Kodama 26 May '13

26 May '13

Hello What happens for this patch? Nozomi

1 1

Re: [PATCH] wininet: do avoid overwriting the buffer (Coverity)
by Marvin 26 May '13

26 May '13

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at http://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=25714 Your paranoid android. === WXPX64 (32 bit http) === http.c:4291: Test failed: 4462: expected status 100 got 10 http.c:4291: Test failed: 4506: expected status 100 got 40 http.c:4264: Test failed: ar->dwResult = 0, expected 1 http.c:4291: Test failed: 4515: expected status 70 got 100 http: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7722EDEA === WXPX64 (64 bit http) === http.c:4291: Test failed: 4462: expected status 100 got 10 http.c:4291: Test failed: 4506: expected status 100 got 40 http.c:4264: Test failed: ar->dwResult = 0, expected 1 http.c:4291: Test failed: 4515: expected status 70 got 100 http: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0000000000495D94

1 0