February 2014 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: [PATCH 2/2] d3d9/tests: Test that Direct3D restores the pixel format on the window it targets.
by Marvin 07 Feb '14

07 Feb '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4644 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit device) === device.c:7445: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 device.c:7455: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 === wvista (32 bit device) === device.c:7445: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 device.c:7455: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 === w2008s64 (32 bit device) === device.c:7445: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 device.c:7455: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 === w7pro64 (32 bit device) === device.c:7445: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 device.c:7455: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 === w2008s64 (64 bit device) === device.c:7445: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 device.c:7455: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 === w7pro64 (64 bit device) === device.c:7445: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2 device.c:7455: Test failed: window has pixel format 0, expected 2

1 0

Re: msvcrt: Don't prevent msvcrt from getting unloaded
by Piotr Caban 06 Feb '14

06 Feb '14

On 02/06/14 15:54, Piotr Caban wrote: > --- > dlls/msvcrt/main.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) Please ignore this patch for now. It breaks the app it was originally added for (bug 21930).

1 0

Wine at LinuxTag in Berlin
by Michael Stefaniuc 06 Feb '14

06 Feb '14

Hello guys, to follow up to Jeremy's email on doing more Wine "evangelism" the idea quickly came up to do something for LinuxTag which happens from 8th to 10th May in Berlin / Germany http://www.linuxtag.org/2014/en/ . Talks: ------ The deadline for proposals is the 7th February. - I will submit a talk proposal: "Is Wine Still Relevant?" with a a subtitle along the lines of "A Wine status update focusing on current use cases and new exciting developments". Needs more buzzwords, I know ;) - Marcus had other ideas for talks, of course somebody would need to hold them. <_Marcus_> and a Playing Windows games with Wine could be seperate if necessary /& wanted... would surely also be interesting <_Marcus_> and Wine on Android , which I was surprised to have it fill the room ;) <_Marcus_> and a pipelight talk ... that would surely pull folks. - We're open to other talk proposals. Please don't hesitate to reply if you're interested. Booth: ------ - I'm still trying to figure out the deadline for the registration of a booth. - With 3 days this is a significant time investment. - Needs around 3-4 people to man the booth. - We could share a booth with an other project but we will still need at least 2 persons for that, 3 or more is better. - Let me know if somebody is interested in this. bye michael

9 13

Profiling CS:GO
by Brock York 06 Feb '14

06 Feb '14

Hey list I'm trying to find out why CS:GO is slower under wine then windows. When running a benchmark in CS:GO Win8 gets ~134fps and wine ~51fps. I've been following Stefan Dösingers guide ( http://wiki.winehq.org/Performance) and have compiled wined3d for windows and tryed running CS:GO using wined3d under win8 but it just crashes while loading the map. At a guess I'd say once it trys to do 3D rendering. Which brings me to my first question. How do you debug and profile wined3d when using windows? Because when every I tried to run a debugger or attach one under windows or using winedbg the game just crashes when booting. Anti-debug techniques maybe? The second being that when using perf under linux it doens't seem to really be a wined3d problem after all the effort of testing it. Attached is the perf output where is shows most of it's time is spent in the actual csgo.exe code. CS:GO under linux seems to have a lot less cpu utilisation under wine. Win8 65-78% utilisation wine 48-51% utilisation of the cpu. Where should I look next for what's causing the problem? Also I'm really new to wine development. I'm still a uni student. Apologies for anything stupidly obvious I've missed. Regards Brock York.

2 6

Re: kernel32/tests: Add test for FindFirstFileA()
by Dmitry Timoshkov 06 Feb '14

06 Feb '14

Zhenbo Li <litimetal(a)gmail.com> wrote: > + strcpy(buffer2, nonexistent); > + handle = CreateFileA(buffer2, GENERIC_WRITE, 0, NULL, CREATE_ALWAYS, 0, 0 ); There is no need for a strcpy(). > + ok(handle != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE, "failed to create a file\n"); > + handle = FindFirstFileA(buffer2, &data); > + ok(handle != FindFirstFileA, "failed to find an existent file\n"); It would be useful to actually test what FindFirstFileA() returns. Also not leaking the handle *twice* would be a bonus point. -- Dmitry.

2 2

HTTPS-Everywhere (development) now supports winehq.org
by Austin English 06 Feb '14

06 Feb '14

If you're using HTTPS-Everwhere on Firefox, you might want to upgrade to their latest development release: https://www.eff.org/files/https-everywhere-4.0development.15.xpi which now supports winehq.org. Cheers, Austin

1 0

Re: ws2_32: Fix some parameters checking in AcceptEx
by Marvin 06 Feb '14

06 Feb '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4626 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock.c:557: Test failed: oob_server (b34): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:557: Test failed: oob_server (750): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 sock: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00000000 === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:557: Test failed: oob_server (654): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0

1 0

Re: Nikolay Sivov : crypt32/tests: Accept another error code on Win8.
by Joseph Facciponti 05 Feb '14

05 Feb '14

Please remove me from mailng list. On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julliard(a)winehq.org>wrote: > Module: wine > Branch: master > Commit: c7a11f9ed619dfd586e96917faa1ee83d64c7352 > URL: > http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=c7a11f9ed619dfd586e96917f… > > Author: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com> > Date: Wed Feb 5 21:50:32 2014 +0400 > > crypt32/tests: Accept another error code on Win8. > > --- > > dlls/crypt32/tests/cert.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/crypt32/tests/cert.c b/dlls/crypt32/tests/cert.c > index bd67c18..9c95629 100644 > --- a/dlls/crypt32/tests/cert.c > +++ b/dlls/crypt32/tests/cert.c > @@ -3724,7 +3724,7 @@ static void testAcquireCertPrivateKey(void) > &keyProvInfo); > ret = pCryptAcquireCertificatePrivateKey(cert, 0, NULL, &csp, > &keySpec, > &callerFree); > - ok(!ret && GetLastError() == CRYPT_E_NO_KEY_PROPERTY, > + ok(!ret && (GetLastError() == CRYPT_E_NO_KEY_PROPERTY || > GetLastError() == NTE_BAD_KEYSET /* win8 */), > "Expected CRYPT_E_NO_KEY_PROPERTY, got %08x\n", GetLastError()); > > pCryptAcquireContextA(&csp, cspNameA, MS_DEF_PROV_A, PROV_RSA_FULL, > > > >

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] ws2_32: Add an interactive test for interface change notifications (resend).
by Marvin 05 Feb '14

05 Feb '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4612 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit sock) === sock.c:557: Test failed: oob_server (af4): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w2008s64 (32 bit sock) === sock.c:557: Test failed: oob_server (750): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0 === w2008s64 (64 bit sock) === sock.c:557: Test failed: oob_server (750): unexpectedly at the OOB mark: 0

1 0

Re: [PATCH] shell32/tests: Remove some assertions in test code
by Marvin 05 Feb '14

05 Feb '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://newtestbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=4602 Your paranoid android. === wxppro (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1204: Test failed: expected 1 args, got 4 shlexec.c:2247: Test failed: argcA expected 5, but got 4 === w2008s64 (32 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1545: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:/Users/ADMINI~1/AppData/Local/Temp/wt28F.tmp/test file.shlexec', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt28F.tmp\test file.shlexec' shlexec.c:2623: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt28F.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt28F.tmp\test2.exe' shlexec.c:2636: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt28F.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt28F.tmp\test2.exe' shlexec.c:2648: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt28F.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt28F.tmp\test2.exe' === w2008s64 (64 bit shlexec) === shlexec.c:1545: Test failed: argvA4 expected 'C:/Users/ADMINI~1/AppData/Local/Temp/wt176.tmp/test file.shlexec', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt176.tmp\test file.shlexec' shlexec.c:2623: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt176.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt176.tmp\test2.exe' shlexec.c:2636: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt176.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt176.tmp\test2.exe' shlexec.c:2648: Test failed: longPath expected 'C:\Users\ADMINI~1\AppData\Local\Temp\wt176.tmp\test2.exe', got 'C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\wt176.tmp\test2.exe'

2 1