August 2014 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: d3d10_1.idl: Added some missing constants.
by Henri Verbeet 19 Aug '14

19 Aug '14

In my copy of the PSDK these are guarded by _D3D10_1_CONSTANTS, although it's not entirely clear to me if that actually does anything, since it's only used there, inside d3d10_1.idl.

2 1

Re: [1/2] wbemprox: Implement __SystemSecurity::GetSD.
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8576 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (64 bit query) === query: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0000000077336B27 === w2008s64 (64 bit query) === query: unhandled exception c0000005 at 0000000077C76B27

1 0

Re: [PATCH 7/7] vbscript: Implemented Log(try 4)
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8570 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 6/7] vbscript: Implemented Exp(try 4)
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8569 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 5/7] vbscript: Implemented Atn(try 4)
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8568 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/7] vbscript: Implemented Tan(try 4)
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8567 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/7] vbscript: Implemented Sin(try 4)
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8566 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/7] vbscript: Implemented Cos(try 4)
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8565 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/7] vbscript: Implemented Sqr(try 4)
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8564 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: ddraw/tests: Correct test condition (PVS-Studio)
by Marvin 18 Aug '14

18 Aug '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8529 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:272: Test failed: lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(00000000) differs from the one returned by Lock(00A10028) === wxppro (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:272: Test failed: lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(00000000) differs from the one returned by Lock(00B50028) === wvistau64 (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:272: Test failed: lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(00000000) differs from the one returned by Lock(02C70028) === w2008s64 (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:272: Test failed: lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(00000000) differs from the one returned by Lock(02B90028) === w7u (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:272: Test failed: lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(00000000) differs from the one returned by Lock(01B70028) === w8 (32 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:272: Test failed: lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(00000000) differs from the one returned by Lock(019F0000) === wvistau64 (64 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:272: Test failed: lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(0000000000000000) differs from the one returned by Lock(00000000029F0040) === w2008s64 (64 bit dsurface) === dsurface.c:272: Test failed: lpSurface from GetSurfaceDesc(0000000000000000) differs from the one returned by Lock(00000000031A0040)

5 5