November 2015 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: README: add a note about 64-bit Wine needing 32-bit Wine to work
by Dmitry Timoshkov 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

Austin English <austinenglish(a)gmail.com> wrote: > + http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64 for details. Note that a 64-bit Wine > + build will not work without also building 32-bit Wine. This statement is not true in general. Actually 64-bit Wine build works just fine without any 32-bit part. That's just a useless configuration, but it's a minor detail. -- Dmitry.

5 10

Re: [PATCH] oleaut32/tests: Some tests for SafeArrayDestroyData()
by Marvin 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18658 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (64 bit safearray) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit safearray) === No test summary line found === w7pro64 (64 bit safearray) === No test summary line found === w864 (64 bit safearray) === No test summary line found === w1064 (64 bit safearray) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ntdll/tests: Add SIMD exception test for floating point invalid operation fault (try 2).
by Marvin 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18657 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003D0000/003D0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003D0000 exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77BAED97/003D0001 === w7u (32 bit exception) === exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 002F0000/002F0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 002F0000 exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77CDE34F/002F0001 === w1064 (32 bit exception) === Failure running script in VM: network read timed out (Connect:AgentVersion.h:0/9)

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ntdll/tests: Add SIMD exception test for floating point invalid operation fault.
by Marvin 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18654 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit exception) === exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003D0000/003D0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003D0000 exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77BAED97/003D0001 === w7u (32 bit exception) === exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 003D0000/003D0001 exception: unhandled exception 80000004 at 003D0000 exception.c:485: Test failed: 42: Wrong exception address 77CDE34F/003D0001 === w1064 (32 bit exception) === Failure running script in VM: network read timed out (Connect:AgentVersion.h:0/9)

1 0

Fwd: rsaenh: Remove dead assignments (Clang)
by Henri Verbeet 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

On 29 November 2015 at 23:39, Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead(a)gmail.com> wrote: > This and advapi32 looks like was done on purpose. Why are you removing that? > Regardless of the merit of the various patches in this series, I think at best this kind of thing should get a "Deferred".

1 0

Re: [v2] ieframe: Don't release the advise sink in IOleObject::SetClientSite.
by Jacek Caban 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

Signed-off-by: Jacek Caban <jacek(a)codeweavers.com>

1 0

Re: kernel32/tests: Fix the argument order in some console font tests
by Marvin 30 Nov '15

30 Nov '15

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=18627 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit console) === console.c:1445: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2359244 console.c:1445: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2359244 console.c:1445: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2359244 console.c:1689: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2359244 console.c:1689: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2359244 console.c:1689: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2359244 === w864 (32 bit console) === console.c:1445: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2686924 console.c:1445: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2686924 console.c:1445: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2686924 console.c:1689: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2686924 console.c:1689: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2686924 console.c:1689: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2686924 === w1064 (32 bit console) === console.c:2567: Test failed: expected ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE, got 1 console.c:2573: Test failed: expected ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY, got 998 console.c:2580: Test failed: expected ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY, got 998 console.c:2587: Test failed: expected ERROR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY, got 998 console.c:1270: Test failed: expected VerifyConsoleIoHandle to succeed console.c:1445: Test failed: [3] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 0 console.c:1445: Test failed: [11] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 0 console.c:1445: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2752460 console.c:1445: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2752460 console.c:1445: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2752460 console.c:1689: Test failed: [3] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 0 console.c:1689: Test failed: [11] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 0 console.c:1689: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2752460 console.c:1689: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2752460 console.c:1689: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2752460 console.c:2148: Test failed: [7] Expected count to be 0, got 1 console.c:2214: Test failed: [7] Expected count to be 0, got 1 console.c:2280: Test failed: [7] Expected count to be 0, got 1 === w1064 (64 bit console) === console.c:1445: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2037567264 console.c:1445: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2037567264 console.c:1445: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2037567264 console.c:1689: Test failed: [13] Expected output count to be 0, got 2037567264 console.c:1689: Test failed: [15] Expected output count to be 0, got 2037567264 console.c:1689: Test failed: [18] Expected output count to be 3735928559, got 2037567264

2 1

contribute to wine
by Abhijeet Panda 29 Nov '15

29 Nov '15

hello everyone, I am a undergrad student and have been using wine on my linux for a while. I am a big fan of this program and I want to contribute a lot to this. I have been through the getting started page. Is there anyone who could tell me the projects which are open and I could contribute to. thank you

3 2

Re: [v3] po: Update Simplified Chinese translation.
by Jactry Zeng 29 Nov '15

29 Nov '15

Hi Boyuan, Thanks for update! > #: oleacc.rc:99 > #, fuzzy > -#| msgid "Select" > msgctxt "object state" > msgid "selected" > msgstr "选择" I think "selected" here can be translated as "已选择". -- Regards, Jactry Zeng

1 0

Re: Revert "opengl32: Return a NULL pointer for functions requiring unsupported or disabled extensions.".
by Henri Verbeet 29 Nov '15

29 Nov '15

This is wrong. I we really want to add hacks for specific combinations of broken drivers and applications, we should be adding exceptions for specific extensions / functions. In the specific example of bug 38480, it should be easy enough to implement the required functionality on top of the core functionality in OpenGL 1.2 if the extension is not available.

6 16