April 2016 - Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

Re: Assorted comment, trace and ok() message spelling fixes.
by Marvin 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22087 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit uri) === uri.c:7615: Test failed: Expected google.com.uk but got L"com.uk" on uri_tests[71].str_props[3]. uri.c:7615: Test failed: Expected google.uk.1 but got L"uk.1" on uri_tests[73].str_props[3]. uri.c:7613: Test failed: GetPropertyBSTR returned 0x00000000, expected 0x00000001. On uri_tests[76].str_props[3]. uri.c:7615: Test failed: Expected but got L".uk" on uri_tests[76].str_props[3]. uri.c:7615: Test failed: Expected google.com.[] but got L"com.[]" on uri_tests[77].str_props[3]. uri.c:7800: Test failed: Error: Expected google.com.uk but got L"com.uk" on uri_tests[71]. uri.c:7800: Test failed: Error: Expected google.uk.1 but got L"uk.1" on uri_tests[73]. uri.c:7798: Test failed: Error: GetDomain returned 0x00000000, expected 0x00000001 on uri_tests[76]. uri.c:7800: Test failed: Error: Expected but got L".uk" on uri_tests[76]. uri.c:7800: Test failed: Error: Expected google.com.[] but got L"com.[]" on uri_tests[77]. uri.c:8080: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 13 but got 6 on uri_tests[71].str_props[3]. uri.c:8080: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 11 but got 4 on uri_tests[73].str_props[3]. uri.c:8078: Test failed: Error: GetPropertyLength returned 0x00000000, expected 0x00000001 on uri_tests[76].str_props[3]. uri.c:8080: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 0 but got 3 on uri_tests[76].str_props[3]. uri.c:8080: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 13 but got 6 on uri_tests[77].str_props[3]. uri.c:8147: Test failed: Error: Received flag for property 3 when not expected on uri_tests[76]. uri.c:8197: Test failed: Error: Wasn't expecting to have property 3 on uri_tests[76]. uri.c:10487: Test failed: Error: Expected google.com.uk but got L"com.uk" instead on uri_parse_tests[42]. uri.c:10490: Test failed: Error: Expected 13, but got 6 instead on uri_parse_tests[42]. === w1064 (64 bit uri) === uri.c:7615: Test failed: Expected google.com.uk but got L"com.uk" on uri_tests[71].str_props[3]. uri.c:7615: Test failed: Expected google.uk.1 but got L"uk.1" on uri_tests[73].str_props[3]. uri.c:7613: Test failed: GetPropertyBSTR returned 0x00000000, expected 0x00000001. On uri_tests[76].str_props[3]. uri.c:7615: Test failed: Expected but got L".uk" on uri_tests[76].str_props[3]. uri.c:7615: Test failed: Expected google.com.[] but got L"com.[]" on uri_tests[77].str_props[3]. uri.c:7800: Test failed: Error: Expected google.com.uk but got L"com.uk" on uri_tests[71]. uri.c:7800: Test failed: Error: Expected google.uk.1 but got L"uk.1" on uri_tests[73]. uri.c:7798: Test failed: Error: GetDomain returned 0x00000000, expected 0x00000001 on uri_tests[76]. uri.c:7800: Test failed: Error: Expected but got L".uk" on uri_tests[76]. uri.c:7800: Test failed: Error: Expected google.com.[] but got L"com.[]" on uri_tests[77]. uri.c:8080: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 13 but got 6 on uri_tests[71].str_props[3]. uri.c:8080: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 11 but got 4 on uri_tests[73].str_props[3]. uri.c:8078: Test failed: Error: GetPropertyLength returned 0x00000000, expected 0x00000001 on uri_tests[76].str_props[3]. uri.c:8080: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 0 but got 3 on uri_tests[76].str_props[3]. uri.c:8080: Test failed: Error: Expected a length of 13 but got 6 on uri_tests[77].str_props[3]. uri.c:8147: Test failed: Error: Received flag for property 3 when not expected on uri_tests[76]. uri.c:8197: Test failed: Error: Wasn't expecting to have property 3 on uri_tests[76]. uri.c:10487: Test failed: Error: Expected google.com.uk but got L"com.uk" instead on uri_parse_tests[42]. uri.c:10490: Test failed: Error: Expected 13, but got 6 instead on uri_parse_tests[42].

1 0

Re: Assorted comment, trace and ok() message spelling fixes.
by Marvin 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22082 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (64 bit chain) === The test timed out

1 0

Re: Assorted comment, trace and ok() message spelling fixes.
by Marvin 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22080 Your paranoid android. === w864 (32 bit security) === security.c:3964: Test failed: MACHINE\Software owner SID (S-1-5-18) != Administrators SID (S-1-5-32-544). security.c:4018: Test failed: Builtin Admins ACE has unexpected flags (0xa != 0x0) === w1064 (32 bit security) === security.c:3964: Test failed: MACHINE\Software owner SID (S-1-5-18) != Administrators SID (S-1-5-32-544). security.c:4005: Test failed: Builtin Users ACE has unexpected flags (0x12 != 0xa) security.c:4009: Test failed: Builtin Users ACE has unexpected mask (0x20019 != 0x80000000) security.c:4018: Test failed: Builtin Admins ACE has unexpected flags (0x12 != 0x0) === w1064 (64 bit security) === security.c:4005: Test failed: Builtin Users ACE has unexpected flags (0x2 != 0xa) security.c:4009: Test failed: Builtin Users ACE has unexpected mask (0x20019 != 0x80000000) security.c:4018: Test failed: Builtin Admins ACE has unexpected flags (0x2 != 0x0)

1 0

Re: Assorted comment, trace and ok() message spelling fixes.
by Marvin 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22074 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (64 bit device) === device.c:4317: Test failed: cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f. device.c:4326: Test failed: Callback cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f.

1 0

Re: Assorted comment, trace and ok() message spelling fixes.
by Marvin 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22072 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit shlfolder) === shlfolder.c:1591: Test failed: IShellFolder_GetDisplayNameOf(NULL) failed! hr = 80070057 === w1064 (64 bit shlfolder) === shlfolder.c:1591: Test failed: IShellFolder_GetDisplayNameOf(NULL) failed! hr = 80070057

1 0

Re: [PATCH 7/7] d3d8/tests: Add a system memory miptree layout test.
by Marvin 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22069 Your paranoid android. === w8 (32 bit device) === device.c:1372: Test failed: TestCooperativeLevel failed, hr 0x88760868. device.c:1417: Test failed: Reset failed, hr 0x88760868. device.c:1419: Test failed: TestCooperativeLevel failed, hr 0x88760869. device.c:1423: Test failed: Got unexpected value 0 for D3DRS_LIGHTING. device.c:1430: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->X = 10, expected 0. device.c:1431: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->Y = 20, expected 0. device.c:1432: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->Width = 400, expected 800. device.c:1433: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->Height = 300, expected 600. device.c:1434: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->MinZ = 2.00000003e-001, expected 0. device.c:1435: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->MaxZ = 3.00000012e-001, expected 1. device.c:1440: Test failed: Screen width is 640, expected 800. device.c:1441: Test failed: Screen height is 480, expected 600. device.c:1447: Test failed: Back buffer width is 640, expected 800. device.c:1449: Test failed: Back buffer height is 480, expected 600. device.c:1479: Test failed: Screen width is 640, expected 1024. device.c:1480: Test failed: Screen height is 480, expected 768. device.c:2725: Test failed: Expected message 0x7e for window 0, but didn't receive it. device.c:2730: Test failed: The focus window is active. device.c:2738: Test failed: Got unexpected hr 0x88760869. device.c:2742: Test failed: Got unexpect screen size 800x600. device.c:2757: Test failed: Expected message 0x47 for window 0, but didn't receive it, i=1. device.c:2766: Test failed: Got unexpect screen size 800x600. device.c:2779: Test failed: Expected message 0x7e for window 0, but didn't receive it. device.c:2787: Test failed: Got unexpect width 640. device.c:2788: Test failed: Got unexpect height 480. === w864 (32 bit device) === device.c:1372: Test failed: TestCooperativeLevel failed, hr 0x88760868. device.c:1417: Test failed: Reset failed, hr 0x88760868. device.c:1419: Test failed: TestCooperativeLevel failed, hr 0x88760869. device.c:1423: Test failed: Got unexpected value 0 for D3DRS_LIGHTING. device.c:1430: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->X = 10, expected 0. device.c:1431: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->Y = 20, expected 0. device.c:1432: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->Width = 400, expected 800. device.c:1433: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->Height = 300, expected 600. device.c:1434: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->MinZ = 2.00000003e-001, expected 0. device.c:1435: Test failed: D3DVIEWPORT->MaxZ = 3.00000012e-001, expected 1. device.c:1440: Test failed: Screen width is 640, expected 800. device.c:1441: Test failed: Screen height is 480, expected 600. device.c:1447: Test failed: Back buffer width is 640, expected 800. device.c:1449: Test failed: Back buffer height is 480, expected 600. device.c:1479: Test failed: Screen width is 640, expected 1024. device.c:1480: Test failed: Screen height is 480, expected 768. device.c:2725: Test failed: Expected message 0x7e for window 0, but didn't receive it. device.c:2730: Test failed: The focus window is active. device.c:2738: Test failed: Got unexpected hr 0x88760869. device.c:2742: Test failed: Got unexpect screen size 800x600. device.c:2757: Test failed: Expected message 0x47 for window 0, but didn't receive it, i=1. device.c:2766: Test failed: Got unexpect screen size 800x600. device.c:2779: Test failed: Expected message 0x7e for window 0, but didn't receive it. device.c:2787: Test failed: Got unexpect width 640. device.c:2788: Test failed: Got unexpect height 480. === w1064 (32 bit device) === device.c:2725: Test failed: Expected message 0x7e for window 0, but didn't receive it. device.c:2730: Test failed: The focus window is active. device.c:2738: Test failed: Got unexpected hr 0x88760869. device.c:2742: Test failed: Got unexpect screen size 800x600. device.c:2757: Test failed: Expected message 0x47 for window 0, but didn't receive it, i=1. device.c:2766: Test failed: Got unexpect screen size 800x600. device.c:2779: Test failed: Expected message 0x7e for window 0, but didn't receive it. device.c:2787: Test failed: Got unexpect width 640. device.c:2788: Test failed: Got unexpect height 480.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 6/7] d3d9/tests: Add a system memory miptree layout test.
by Marvin 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=22068 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (64 bit device) === device.c:4317: Test failed: cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f. device.c:4326: Test failed: Callback cw is 0xf60, expected 0x7f.

1 0

EVE using Wine on Mac
by Snorri Sturluson 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

About a month ago CCP announced support for running EVE Online on Mac using Wine (https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6380823#post6380823) I am the primary developer on this project, and wanted to express my gratitude to the Wine community for making this possible. This experiment is going well - there have been some issues with getting Wine to run on all the different OS X versions and different hardware configurations out there, but that has largely been resolved (I think) with proper configuration of the build machine producing the Wine build. My plan is to proactively hunt down and fix any issues our Mac players run into, whether the fix entails digging into Wine source or our own codebase. Ideally everything we do in EVE should just work under Wine, but sometimes a workaround in our code may be easier than hunting down why Wine behaves different from Windows, but being able to debug both sides makes finding workarounds easier. Any fixes I come up with I will contribute to Wine, of course - it remains to be seen if they end up being very EVE specific, as EVE will of course be my main focus. My plan is also to document my experience along the way at http://ccpsnorlax.blogspot.is/ - if you find this interesting, please leave comments there. I hope that my initiative with this project meets with your approval, and look forward to working with the Wine codebase and you, the Wine developers in the future. Snorri Sturluson, Software Architect, CCP Games @CCP_Snorlax - http://ccpsnorlax.blogspot.is/

2 1

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ieframe: Simplify IPersist_Load, make error handling more straightforward (Coverity)
by Jacek Caban 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

Hi Nikolay, On 04/08/16 21:56, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > + /* Now we're going to read in the iconfile and iconindex. > + If we don't find them, that's not a failure case -- it's possible > + that they just aren't in there. */ > + hr = IPropertySetStorage_Open(This->property_set_storage, &FMTID_Intshcut, > + STGM_READWRITE | STGM_SHARE_EXCLUSIVE, &pPropStg); It's an already existing bug, but we should handle Open failure here. Thanks, Jacek

2 2

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ieframe: Convert to integer without additional string buffer allocation
by Jacek Caban 11 Apr '16

11 Apr '16

On 04/08/16 21:56, Nikolay Sivov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > dlls/ieframe/intshcut.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/ieframe/intshcut.c b/dlls/ieframe/intshcut.c > index 385b059..79458ac 100644 > --- a/dlls/ieframe/intshcut.c > +++ b/dlls/ieframe/intshcut.c > @@ -511,12 +511,11 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI PersistFile_Load(IPersistFile *pFile, LPCOLESTR pszFileNam > > if (get_profile_string(str_header, str_iconindex, pszFileName, &iconindexstring) == S_OK) > { > + WCHAR *end; > int iconindex; > PROPSPEC ps; > PROPVARIANT pv; > - char *iconindexastring = co_strdupWtoA(iconindexstring); > - sscanf(iconindexastring, "%d", &iconindex); > - CoTaskMemFree(iconindexastring); > + iconindex = strtolW(iconindexstring, &end, 10); If you don't need end value, you could pass NULL instead. Thanks, Jacek

2 1