- Wine-devel - list.winehq.org

[PATCH] ntdll/signalx86_64: Add CFI for __wine_syscall_dispatcher
by Keno Fischer 29 Jul '22

29 Jul '22

In a debugger that is capable of loading both PE and ELF libraries (e.g. the wine-enhanced GDB version at [1]), this unwind information will allow proper unwind across the __wine_syscall_dispatcher. The CFI itself is relatively straightforward, though the implementation looks a little complex, because support for proper CFI encoding is somewhat limitied in the GNU toolchain. Essentially, as registers are stored in the rcx buffer in this function, we switch their cfi description to point at that rcx buffer, so the registers may be freely used thereafter without affecting the unwind. Eventually the rcx buffer is tracked in rbp instead at which point we pivot the CFI information as well and keep it there for most of the rest of the function. [1] https://github.com/JuliaComputing/gdb-solib-wine Signed-off-by: Keno Fischer <keno(a)juliacomputing.com> --- dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_x86_64.c | 180 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 180 insertions(+) diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_x86_64.c b/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_x86_64.c index d6f19dbfa84..a6b79335fab 100644 --- a/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_x86_64.c +++ b/dlls/ntdll/unix/signal_x86_64.c @@ -442,6 +442,10 @@ static USHORT fs32_sel; /* selector for %fs in 32-bit mode */ * Definitions for Dwarf unwind tables */ +/* For use in inline-assembly and other contexts where C enums are unavailable */ +#define PP_DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression 0xf +#define PP_DW_CFA_expression 0x10 + enum dwarf_call_frame_info { DW_CFA_advance_loc = 0x40, @@ -472,6 +476,14 @@ enum dwarf_call_frame_info DW_CFA_val_expression = 0x16, }; +/* DWARF State machine ops */ +#define PP_DW_OP_const1u 0x08 +#define PP_DW_OP_breg_base 0x70 +#define PP_DW_OP_minus 0x1c +#define PP_DW_OP_deref 0x06 +#define PP_DW_OP_plus 0x22 +#define PP_DW_OP_plus_uconst 0x23 + enum dwarf_operation { DW_OP_addr = 0x03, @@ -3288,35 +3300,176 @@ __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC( signal_exit_thread, __ASM_CFI(".cfi_rel_offset %r15,8\n\t") "call *%rsi" ) + +/*********************************************************************** + * CFI Utility definitions + * + * These utility definitions help encode CFI unwind information (for consumption + * in gdb and similar debuggers), improving the accuracy of backtraces. + */ + +/* DWARF Register ordering for x86_64 */ +#define X86_64_DWARF_RAX 0x00 +#define X86_64_DWARF_RDX 0x01 +#define X86_64_DWARF_RCX 0x02 +#define X86_64_DWARF_RBX 0x03 +#define X86_64_DWARF_RSI 0x04 +#define X86_64_DWARF_RDI 0x05 +#define X86_64_DWARF_RBP 0x06 +#define X86_64_DWARF_RSP 0x07 +#define X86_64_DWARF_R8 0x08 +#define X86_64_DWARF_R9 0x09 +#define X86_64_DWARF_R10 0x0a +#define X86_64_DWARF_R11 0x0b +#define X86_64_DWARF_R12 0x0c +#define X86_64_DWARF_R13 0x0d +#define X86_64_DWARF_R14 0x0e +#define X86_64_DWARF_R15 0x0f +#define X86_64_DWARF_RIP 0x10 + +/* __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET(REG_SAVE, REG, OFFSET) + * + * Declare that the register with DWARF register number `REG` is + * saved at offset `OFFSET` from the register with DWARF register + * number `REG_SAVE`. I.e.: + * + * REG (in previous frame) = *(%REG_SAVE + OFFSET) + */ +#define _STR(R) #R +#define __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET(REG_SAVE, REG, OFFSET) \ + ".cfi_escape " #PP_DW_CFA_expression", " \ + _STR(REG) "," /* The register being saved */ \ + " 0x02," /* 2 bytes follow */ \ + #PP_DW_OP_breg_base " + " _STR(REG_SAVE) ", " #OFFSET ";\n\t" + +/* __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET2(REG_SAVE, REG, OFFSET1, OFFSET2) + * + * Like __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET, expect for offsets of more than + * 7 bits. Takes an SLEB128 encoded offset as two bytes. Thus to e.g. + * encode an offset of 0x70, convert to SLEB128 first: + * + * HEX: 0x70 + * BINARY: 01110000 + * SLEB128: 11110000 00000000 + * |||||||| |||||||| + * |||||||| \------- High bits + * |\------ Low bits + * \- Continuation Bit + * + * SLEB128: 0xf0 0x00 + */ +#define __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET2(REG_SAVE, REG, OFFSET1, OFFSET2) \ + ".cfi_escape " #PP_DW_CFA_expression", " \ + _STR(REG) "," /* The register being saved */ \ + " 0x03," /* 3 bytes follow */ \ + #PP_DW_OP_breg_base " + " _STR(REG_SAVE) ", " #OFFSET1 ", " #OFFSET2 ";\n\t" + +/* __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, REG, OFFSET, OFFSET_SUB) + * + * Like __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET, except encodes that the saved + * register value is at `*(%REG_SAVE + OFFSET - OFFSET_SUB). + */ +#define __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, REG, OFFSET, OFFSET_SUB) \ + ".cfi_escape " #PP_DW_CFA_expression", " \ + _STR(REG) "," /* The register being saved */ \ + " 0x05," /* 5 bytes follow */ \ + #PP_DW_OP_breg_base " + " _STR(REG_SAVE) ", " #OFFSET "," \ + #PP_DW_OP_const1u ", " #OFFSET_SUB "," #PP_DW_OP_minus ";\n\t" + +/* __ASM_CFA_AT_REG_OFFSET(REG_SAVE, OFFSET) + * + * Declares the CFA of set frame to be stored at *(REG_SAVE + OFFSET). + * Note that the CFA is ordinarily the same as the stack pointer at the end + * of the previous frame, but these are technically separate concepts. + */ +#define __ASM_CFA_AT_REG_OFFSET(REG_SAVE, OFFSET) \ + ".cfi_escape " #PP_DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression "," \ + " 0x03," /* 3 bytes follow */ \ + #PP_DW_OP_breg_base " + " _STR(REG_SAVE) ", " #OFFSET ", " \ + #PP_DW_OP_deref ";\n\t" + +/* __ASM_CFA_AT_REG_OFFSET2(REG_SAVE, OFFSET_HIGH, OFFSET_LOW) + * + * Like __ASM_CFA_AT_REG_OFFSET, except used for larger offsets. `OFFSET_LOW` encodes + * the low 7 bits of the offset. `OFFSET_HIGH` the next 7 bits. + */ +#define __ASM_CFA_AT_REG_OFFSET2(REG_SAVE, OFFSET_HIGH, OFFSET_LOW) \ + ".cfi_escape " DW_CFA_def_cfa_expression "," \ + " 0x04," /* 4 bytes follow */ \ + #PP_DW_OP_breg_base " + " _STR(REG_SAVE) ", " #OFFSET_LOW " | 0x80 , " #OFFSET_HIGH ", " \ + #PP_DW_OP_deref ";\n\t" + +#define __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET(REG, OFFSET) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET(X86_64_DWARF_RCX, REG, OFFSET) +#define __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET2(REG, OFFSET_HIGH, OFFSET_LOW) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET2(X86_64_DWARF_RCX, REG, OFFSET_LOW | 0x80, OFFSET_HIGH) + +/* __ASM_REGSAVE_AT_DWARF_REG_MINUS(REG_SAVE, OFFSET_SUB) + * + * Declares that a `struct syscall_frame` containing the previous frame's registers may + * be found at `*(struct syscall_frame*)(%REG_SAVE - OFFSET_SUB)` and declares both the + * CFA and saved registers may be found in the corresponding offset. + */ +#define __ASM_REGSAVE_AT_DWARF_REG_MINUS(REG_SAVE, OFFSET_SUB) \ + /* N.B.: First argument is SLEB128 encoded, so move the high bit over \ + to the subtraction */ \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_RIP, 0x00, OFFSET_SUB - 0x70) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_RAX, 0x00, OFFSET_SUB) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_RBX, 0x08, OFFSET_SUB) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_RDX, 0x18, OFFSET_SUB) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_RSI, 0x20, OFFSET_SUB) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_RDI, 0x28, OFFSET_SUB) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_R12, 0x00, OFFSET_SUB - 0x50) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_R14, 0x10, OFFSET_SUB - 0x50) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_RSP, 0x08, OFFSET_SUB - 0x80) \ + /* -0x10 in 7bit 2's complement */ \ + __ASM_CFA_AT_REG_OFFSET(REG_SAVE, 0x70) \ + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET_MINUS(REG_SAVE, X86_64_DWARF_RBP, 0x18, OFFSET_SUB - 0x80) + /*********************************************************************** * __wine_syscall_dispatcher */ __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC( __wine_syscall_dispatcher, "movq %gs:0x30,%rcx\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_undefined rcx\n\t") "movq 0x328(%rcx),%rcx\n\t" /* amd64_thread_data()->syscall_frame */ "popq 0x70(%rcx)\n\t" /* frame->rip */ + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_adjust_cfa_offset -8\n\t") + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET2(X86_64_DWARF_RIP, 0x00, 0x70) "pushfq\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_adjust_cfa_offset 8\n\t") "popq 0x80(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_adjust_cfa_offset -8\n\t") "movl $0,0x94(%rcx)\n\t" /* frame->restore_flags */ ".globl " __ASM_NAME("__wine_syscall_dispatcher_prolog_end") "\n" __ASM_NAME("__wine_syscall_dispatcher_prolog_end") ":\n\t" "movq %rax,0x00(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET(X86_64_DWARF_RAX, 0x00) "movq %rbx,0x08(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET(X86_64_DWARF_RBX, 0x08) "movq %rdx,0x18(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET(X86_64_DWARF_RDX, 0x18) "movq %rsi,0x20(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET(X86_64_DWARF_RSI, 0x20) "movq %rdi,0x28(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET(X86_64_DWARF_RDI, 0x28) "movq %r12,0x50(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET2(X86_64_DWARF_R12, 0x00, 0x50) "movq %r13,0x58(%rcx)\n\t" "movq %r14,0x60(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET2(X86_64_DWARF_R14, 0x00, 0x60) "movq %r15,0x68(%rcx)\n\t" "movw %cs,0x78(%rcx)\n\t" "movw %ds,0x7a(%rcx)\n\t" "movw %es,0x7c(%rcx)\n\t" "movw %fs,0x7e(%rcx)\n\t" "movq %rsp,0x88(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET2(X86_64_DWARF_RSP, 0x01, 0x08) + __ASM_CFA_AT_REG_OFFSET2(X86_64_DWARF_RCX, 0x01, 0x08) "movw %ss,0x90(%rcx)\n\t" "movw %gs,0x92(%rcx)\n\t" "movq %rbp,0x98(%rcx)\n\t" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_RCX_OFFSET2(X86_64_DWARF_RBP, 0x01, 0x18) /* Legends of Runeterra hooks the first system call return instruction, and * depends on us returning to it. Adjust the return address accordingly. */ "subq $0xb,0x70(%rcx)\n\t" @@ -3341,6 +3494,8 @@ __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC( __wine_syscall_dispatcher, "jmp 3f\n" "2:\tfxsave64 0xc0(%rcx)\n" "3:\tleaq 0x98(%rcx),%rbp\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_remember_state\n\t") + __ASM_REGSAVE_AT_DWARF_REG_MINUS(X86_64_DWARF_RBP, 0x98) #ifdef __linux__ "testl $12,%r14d\n\t" /* SYSCALL_HAVE_PTHREAD_TEB | SYSCALL_HAVE_WRFSGSBASE */ "jz 2f\n\t" @@ -3402,35 +3557,60 @@ __ASM_GLOBAL_FUNC( __wine_syscall_dispatcher, "jmp 4f\n" "3:\tfxrstor64 0xc0(%rcx)\n" "4:\tmovq 0x98(%rcx),%rbp\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_restore_state\n\t") "movq 0x68(%rcx),%r15\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r15\n\t") "movq 0x60(%rcx),%r14\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r14\n\t") "movq 0x58(%rcx),%r13\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r13\n\t") "movq 0x50(%rcx),%r12\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r12\n\t") "movq 0x28(%rcx),%rdi\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value rdi\n\t") "movq 0x20(%rcx),%rsi\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value rsi\n\t") "movq 0x08(%rcx),%rbx\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value rbx\n\t") "testl $0x3,%edx\n\t" /* CONTEXT_CONTROL | CONTEXT_INTEGER */ "jnz 1f\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_remember_state\n\t") "movq 0x80(%rcx),%r11\n\t" /* frame->eflags */ + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r11\n\t") "pushq %r11\n\t" "popfq\n\t" "movq 0x88(%rcx),%rsp\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value rsp\n\t") "movq 0x70(%rcx),%rcx\n\t" /* frame->rip */ + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_register rip, rcx\n\t") "jmpq *%rcx\n\t" "1:\tleaq 0x70(%rcx),%rsp\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_restore_state\n\t") + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_remember_state\n\t") "testl $0x2,%edx\n\t" /* CONTEXT_INTEGER */ "jnz 1f\n\t" "movq 0x10(%rsp),%r11\n\t" /* frame->eflags */ + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r11\n\t") "movq (%rsp),%rcx\n\t" /* frame->rip */ + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_register rip, rcx\n\t") "iretq\n" "1:\tmovq 0x00(%rcx),%rax\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_restore_state\n\t") + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value rax\n\t") "movq 0x18(%rcx),%rdx\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value rdx\n\t") "movq 0x30(%rcx),%r8\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r8\n\t") "movq 0x38(%rcx),%r9\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r9\n\t") "movq 0x40(%rcx),%r10\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r10\n\t") "movq 0x48(%rcx),%r11\n\t" + __ASM_CFI(".cfi_same_value r11\n\t") "movq 0x10(%rcx),%rcx\n" + __ASM_REG_IS_DEREF_REF_OFFSET(X86_64_DWARF_RSP, X86_64_DWARF_RIP, 0) "iretq\n" + __ASM_REGSAVE_AT_DWARF_REG_MINUS(X86_64_DWARF_RBP, 0x98) "5:\tmovl $0xc000000d,%edx\n\t" /* STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER */ "movq %rsp,%rcx\n\t" ".globl " __ASM_NAME("__wine_syscall_dispatcher_return") "\n" -- 2.25.1

2 1

Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] winmm/tests: Add tests for visibility of video window.
by Marvin 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120073 Your paranoid android. === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === winmm: midi.c:1039: Test failed: bad message 1e/0 from midiStreamOut, expect 3c9/22f940 midi.c:1048: Test failed: bad message 3c9/22f940 from midiStreamClose, expect 3c8/0 === w7u_el (32 bit report) === winmm: midi.c:988: Test failed: bad message 1e/0 from midiStreamOpen, expect 3c7/0 midi.c:1039: Test failed: bad message 3c7/0 from midiStreamOut, expect 3c9/22f940 midi.c:1048: Test failed: bad message 3c9/22f940 from midiStreamClose, expect 3c8/0

1 0

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ddraw/tests: Add some video memory accounting tests.
by Marvin 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120071 Your paranoid android. === w8adm (32 bit report) === ddraw: ddraw7.c:18888: Test failed: Got unexpected color 0x0000ff00. === w864 (32 bit report) === ddraw: ddraw7.c:18888: Test failed: Got unexpected color 0x0000ff00. === w1064_tsign (32 bit report) === ddraw: ddraw7.c:18888: Test failed: Got unexpected color 0x00000040. === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === Report validation errors: ddraw1: Timeout === debian11 (build log) === WineRunWineTest.pl:error: The task timed out

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/3] mshtml: Implement "text" type response for XMLHttpRequest.
by Marvin 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120063 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE === w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE

1 0

Access to graphics memory mappings on upcoming WOW64 implementation
by Derek Lesho 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi All, In the wake of the new WOW64 implementation (recent explanation [1]), there has been discussion in informal channels about how to we are going to handle pointers to mapped graphics resource memory which we receive from the graphics API, as the possibility exists that it will fall outside of the 32-bit address space. Over time, a few creative solutions have been proposed and discussed, with a common theme being that we need changes in either the kernel or the graphics drivers to do this properly. As we already know the requirements for a solution to this problem, I think it would be responsible to hash this out now and then work with the relevant project maintainers earlier as to avoid blocking work on the wine side too long and to possibly allow more users to test the new path earlier. The solutions which I've seen laid out so far: - Use the mremap(2) interface, allowing us to duplicate the mapping we receive into the 32-bit address space. This solution would match what is already done for Crossover Mac's 32on64 support using Mac's mach_vm_remap functionality [2]. However, right now it is not possible to use the MREMAP_DONTUNMAP flag with mappings that aren't private and anonymous, which rules out there use on mapped FDs from libdrm. Due to this, a kernel change would be necessary. Pro: A uniform solution across all APIs, which could help in the future with any unforeseen need to access host-allocated memory in 32-bit windows code. Cons: Requires a kernel change, which of all the options may take the longest to get up-streamed and in the hands of users. - Work with Khronos to introduce extensions into the relevant APIs enabling us to tell drivers where in the address space we want resources mapped. Pro: Wouldn't require going around the backs of the driver, resulting in a more hardened solution. (Out there, but what if a creative driver returns a mapping without read or write permission and handles accesses through a page fault handler?) Cons: The extension would have to be implemented by each individual vendor for every relevant API. This would implicitly drop support for those with cards whose graphics drivers are no longer being updated. - Hook the driver's mmap call when we invoke memory mappings function, overriding the address to something in the 32-bit address space. Pro: Unlike the other solutions, this wouldn't require any changes to other projects, and shares the advantage of the first solution. Cons: Susceptible to breakage if the driver uses their own mapping mechanism separate from mmap. (Custom IOCTL, CPU driver returning something from the heap) 1: https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2022-April/213677.html 2: https://www.codeweavers.com/crossover/source - see function `remap_memory` in `wine/dlls/winemac.drv/opengl.c`

10 15

Re: [PATCH 2/3] mshtml: Implement responseType prop for XMLHttpRequest.
by Marvin 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120062 Your paranoid android. === w10pro64 (64 bit report) === mshtml: htmldoc.c:2541: Test failed: unexpected call UpdateUI htmldoc.c:2853: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_UPDATECOMMANDS htmldoc.c:350: Test failed: expected Exec_SETTITLE htmldoc.c:2859: Test failed: unexpected call Exec_SETTITLE

1 0

Re: [PATCH 11/11] mciqtz32: Show the default video window when switching from another one.
by Marvin 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120094 Your paranoid android. === w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (100,100)-(236,162), got (100,100)-(232,162) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (175,175)-(311,237), got (175,175)-(307,237) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (125,125)-(261,187), got (125,125)-(257,187) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (100,100)-(236,162), got (100,100)-(232,162) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (175,175)-(311,237), got (175,175)-(307,237) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (75,75)-(211,137), got (75,75)-(207,137) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w7u_el (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (75,75)-(211,137), got (75,75)-(207,137) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w8 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w8adm (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w864 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w864 (64 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === debian11 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit German report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit French report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12)

1 0

Re: [PATCH 10/11] mciqtz32: Hide the default video window when switching to another one.
by Marvin 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120093 Your paranoid android. === w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (100,100)-(236,162), got (100,100)-(232,162) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (100,100)-(236,162), got (100,100)-(232,162) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (175,175)-(311,237), got (175,175)-(307,237) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (75,75)-(211,137), got (75,75)-(207,137) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w7u_el (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (75,75)-(211,137), got (75,75)-(207,137) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w8 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w8adm (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (26,26)-(162,89), got (26,26)-(166,89) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (104,104)-(240,167), got (104,104)-(244,167) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w864 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w864 (64 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === debian11 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit German report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit French report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12)

1 0

Re: [PATCH 09/11] mciqtz32: Reset the video size when switching video destination.
by Marvin 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120092 Your paranoid android. === w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (100,100)-(236,162), got (100,100)-(232,162) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (175,175)-(311,237), got (175,175)-(307,237) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (125,125)-(261,187), got (125,125)-(257,187) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (100,100)-(236,162), got (100,100)-(232,162) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (175,175)-(311,237), got (175,175)-(307,237) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (75,75)-(211,137), got (75,75)-(207,137) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w7u_el (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (75,75)-(211,137), got (75,75)-(207,137) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w8 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w8adm (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (26,26)-(162,89), got (26,26)-(166,89) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (104,104)-(240,167), got (104,104)-(244,167) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w864 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w864 (64 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === debian11 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit German report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit French report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (32 bit WoW report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) === debian11 (64 bit WoW report) === winmm: mci.c:1657: Test failed: 0: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 1: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 2: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 3: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 4: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12) mci.c:1657: Test failed: 5: got (0,0)-(32,24), expected (0,0)-(64,12)

1 0

Re: [PATCH 08/11] mciqtz32: Correct initial video window dimensions.
by Marvin 28 Jul '22

28 Jul '22

Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120091 Your paranoid android. === w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (100,100)-(236,162), got (100,100)-(232,162) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (175,175)-(311,237), got (175,175)-(307,237) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (125,125)-(261,187), got (125,125)-(257,187) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w7u_adm (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (100,100)-(236,162), got (100,100)-(232,162) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (175,175)-(311,237), got (175,175)-(307,237) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (75,75)-(211,137), got (75,75)-(207,137) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w7u_el (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (75,75)-(211,137), got (75,75)-(207,137) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (25,25)-(161,87), got (25,25)-(157,87) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,62), got (0,0)-(132,62) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (150,150)-(286,212), got (150,150)-(282,212) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,63), got (1,1)-(133,63) === w8 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w8adm (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (26,26)-(162,89), got (26,26)-(166,89) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (104,104)-(240,167), got (104,104)-(244,167) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w864 (32 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64) === w864 (64 bit report) === winmm: mci.c:1600: Test failed: 0: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (156,156)-(292,219), got (156,156)-(296,219) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 1: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (52,52)-(188,115), got (52,52)-(192,115) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 2: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (130,130)-(266,193), got (130,130)-(270,193) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 3: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (0,0)-(136,63), got (0,0)-(140,63) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 4: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (78,78)-(214,141), got (78,78)-(218,141) mci.c:1600: Test failed: 5: window rectangle doesn't match, expected (1,1)-(137,64), got (1,1)-(141,64)

1 0