May 2024 - Wine-gitlab - list.winehq.org

[PATCH 0/3] MR5328: wined3d: Fixes for ARB_bindless_texture support.
by Zebediah Figura (＠zfigura) 28 May '24

28 May '24

-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5328

4 5

[PATCH v8 0/3] MR5060: win32u, explorer, winex11.drv: Restore display settings on process exit.
by Anton Baskanov (＠baskanov) 28 May '24

28 May '24

-- v8: explorer: Restore display settings on process exit. winex11.drv: Process RRNotify events in xrandr14_get_id. user32/tests: Test that display settings are restored on process exit. https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5060

4 10

[PATCH v4 0/5] MR5306: win32u: Move D3DKMT vulkan implementation out of winex11.
by Rémi Bernon 28 May '24

28 May '24

With some intermediate refactoring to make the code simpler. I believe the failures that happened previously were coming from how NtGdiDdDDIOpenAdapterFromLuid initialized desc->hAdapter in win32u while winex11 was then relying on it. I missed this detail before and it should be working fine now that the vulkan path is only used to retrieve the physical device. -- v4: win32u: Move D3DKMT vulkan implementation out of winex11. winex11: Introduce a new find_adapter_from_handle helper. winex11: Introduce a new get_vulkan_physical_device helper. winex11: Initialize D3DKMT vulkan instance only once. win32u: Open adapters in NtGdiDdDDIEnumAdapters2 outside of the display devices lock. https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5306

2 7

[PATCH 0/1] MR5404: windows.perception.stub: Add stub IHolographicSpaceInterop interface.
by Paul Gofman (＠gofman) 28 May '24

28 May '24

-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5404

2 2

[PATCH 0/6] MR5724: widl: Various fixes.
by Elizabeth Figura (＠zfigura) 28 May '24

28 May '24

-- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5724

2 6

[PATCH 0/3] MR5728: ntdll/tests: Rewrite the RtlQueryRegistryValues tests and succeed on direct query of nonexistent value.
by Alex Henrie (＠alexhenrie) 28 May '24

28 May '24

The original tests were very aspirational and didn't actually test much. https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49703 -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5728

2 3

Re: [PATCH 0/5] MR5744: winegstreamer: Fix various Cinepak issues
by Alfred Agrell (＠Alcaro) 28 May '24

28 May '24

Tests failed. Apparently the AVI decoder is expected to enumerate formats that it doesn't actually support? ?_? and also ಠ_ಠ. Well, that's not the first insane part of Windows I've seen. Apparently something calls pin_query_accept anyways, so that patch is unnecessary. Also fixed 16bit BI_RGB in the iccvid patch. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5744#note_71576

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] MR5667: winegstreamer: Use GstCaps for wg_parser internal formats.
by Elizabeth Figura (＠zfigura) 28 May '24

28 May '24

> > If you wish to have me removed as maintainer of winegstreamer, please propose that directly, rather than abusing GitLab to get your patches committed. > > This is not an automated process and I don't think I'm abusing any mechanism here. Well... unless I'm mistaken, it kind of is. The whole point of using Gitlab's reviewers feature is to have the software track things so that Alexandre doesn't have to. If he has to look at every patch to check if the right people have reviewed it then that point is defeated. If he's just looking for patches with no pending review [in areas that are known to have a maintainer] then removing a reviewer will make a patch effectively ready to commit. I can only assume this is why my patches to wined3d have been committed without Jan's approval when the bot flakes out and doesn't assign Jan as a reviewer. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5667#note_71571

1 0

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] MR5724: widl: Various fixes.
by Elizabeth Figura (＠zfigura) 28 May '24

28 May '24

On Tue May 28 07:03:51 2024 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote: > Can this really happen? If that's the case then sure. Yes. I don't imagine anyone does it but it's how midl behaves. -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5724#note_71568

1 0

Re: [PATCH v8 0/11] MR5444: jscript: Do not allocate dispex_prop_t for indexed props.
by Gabriel Ivăncescu 28 May '24

28 May '24

On Mon May 13 19:14:17 2024 +0000, Gabriel Ivăncescu wrote: > > They could potentially be just indices, the association between name > and ID may be easily done on MSHTML side (it's already doing that now). > I don't think I follow. The name is used for jscript prop lookup, not > mshtml. We absolutely need it for hash and standard name lookup. It's > not an internal thing. PROP_PROXY doesn't care what name it has, it only > stores the DISPID (index basically) to access it from mshtml. But > looking it up **does** require name, because the prop has a name, so we > do need dispex_prop_t, just like builtins. To be fair I'm talking about > **being accessed by name via jscript**, nothing to do with mshtml internals. > Think of window props, for example. I'm not talking about simple dynamic > props on the window, which can be stored in jscript as simple values > (and will be, later though, not in my branch yet, as I said I don't want > to overcomplicate it). Instead, think of the other "global_props" (from > mshtml's meaning of it) on the window, such as other scripts, elements, > etc. Those need PROP_PROXY to get accessed… > > I think I can live with it, but note that the requirement to create a > function object instance for all MSHTML builtin functions that are used > is not exactly optimal. It would be possible to optimize that in the > future, hopefully without full rewrite of the interface. Just like we do > for jscript builtin functions. > We can save that for later, but I believe it's as optimal as builtins > right now. That is, they get allocated on demand (when needed), but > otherwise we need them as functions, because even builtins had to be > converted from builtins into actual functions at some point. Only the > "value prop" builtins still remain as such (it's same with PROP_PROXY). > > Sure, although... it's by no means something for now, but I could > imagine getting rid of `PROP_BUILTIN` and use the same 'external' > properties for them instead, just like other external props (MSHTML and > indexed props in the current proposal). > How would that work? Builtins have a name, so we can't just use the same > as indexed props because such name needs to have a DISPID mapping to it > and be looked up by hash. We could use an extra layer of mapping for > builtins of course, but I think that's overkill and likely slower > (instead of just one hash lookup, now it's two lookups). > It also complicates it because, for instance, builtins can be deleted, > and then we have to actually implement every prop behavior on them > instead of relying on dispex_prop_t facilities. Right now if they get > deleted, the prop remains as PROP_DELETED and so can be easily replaced > by something else. But yeah, maybe it's worth it way later though, we'll > need measurements I guess. After rebasing more of my patches, I found a problem with the IID approach, when it comes to weird prototype chains. For example the HTMLCurrentStyle shares an "abstract" common prototype with HTMLStyle, even though some of those methods don't work on it. But some are exposed in multiple interfaces, for instance the `zoom` prop setter (not getter). The IID would have the IHTMLStyle3 interface (which is correct), but when looking the "zoom" prop up on HTMLCurrentStyle via DISPID, it would get the one from CSSStyleDeclaration, which has different behavior. Yes, it's weird as hell, and my explanation isn't that great either. Anyway, the IID isn't that useful, mshtml already queries the IID for the respective function. Instead I'm now using a mixed approach where I have a new method (but a normal method in the vtbl like PropInvoke rather than a function pointer callback) that uses a "func_ctx" which is basically the `func_info_t` (it's opaque to jscript, it doesn't care). This way there's zero ambiguity as to which function is actually used, and the prototype chain fiasco is cleanly solved. All tests pass now. Anyway, this is not very related to this MR, is there something I can do to get this moving? -- https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/5444#note_71566

1 0