August 2012 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 25579] New: Microsoft Flight Simulator X: cannot activate product
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 12, 2021

Feb. 12, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25579 Summary: Microsoft Flight Simulator X: cannot activate product Product: Wine Version: 1.3.9 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Terminal shows some wininet fixme's: fixme:wininet:CommitUrlCacheEntryInternal entry already in cache - don't know what to do! fixme:wininet:CommitUrlCacheEntryInternal entry already in cache - don't know what to do! fixme:wininet:CommitUrlCacheEntryInternal entry already in cache - don't know what to do! fixme:wininet:CommitUrlCacheEntryInternal entry already in cache - don't know what to do! fixme:wininet:CommitUrlCacheEntryInternal entry already in cache - don't know what to do! fixme:wininet:CommitUrlCacheEntryInternal entry already in cache - don't know what to do! so I tried native wininet, no dice. Next was a winhttp error: err:winhttp:netconn_secure_connect couldn't verify server certificate (12057) so 'winetricks winhttp'. Still no luck: austin(a)aw21 ~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Microsoft Games/Microsoft Flight Simulator X $ wine fsx.exe fixme:heap:HeapSetInformation 0x750000 0 0x32f36c 4 fixme:heap:HeapSetInformation 0x110000 0 0x32f368 4 fixme:heap:HeapSetInformation 0x330000 0 0x32f364 4 fixme:ole:CoInitializeSecurity ((nil),-1,(nil),(nil),0,3,(nil),0,(nil)) - stub! fixme:ras:RasEnumConnectionsW (0x204b90,0x1e1e454,0x1fd2004),stub! fixme:ras:RasEnumConnectionsW RAS support is not implemented! Configure program to use LAN connection/winsock instead! fixme:secur32:schan_InitializeSecurityContextW Using hardcoded "NORMAL" priority fixme:wintrust:HTTPSCertificateTrust (0x1ef968) fixme:wintrust:HTTPSFinalProv (0x1ef968) didn't try beyond that. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 9

[Bug 29849] New: oleaut32's OLEPictureImpl_Load fails when Stat() method is missing
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 12, 2021

Feb. 12, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29849 Bug #: 29849 Summary: oleaut32's OLEPictureImpl_Load fails when Stat() method is missing Product: Wine Version: 1.4-rc2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: oleaut32 AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: michael.blumenkrantz(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 38772 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=38772 test case Without a Stat() method, this function should only read the parts of a file that are needed. Instead, it continues to read and eventually crashes. Find attached a test case which takes an image file as an argument, then crashes. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 23

[Bug 14697] New: wineserver: debug events can block completion of queued user APCs
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 11, 2021

Feb. 11, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14697 Summary: wineserver: debug events can block completion of queued user APCs Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wineserver AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, consider the following scenario... A debugger is attached to a debuggee. The debuggee has two threads. The debugger processes debug events and queries virtual memory info of remote process using VirtualQueryEx in its main loop. VirtualQueryEx -> NtQueryVirtualMemory -> enqueues APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY user APC for remote process (debuggee). The calling thread is blocked until the APC is completed. Following is the "good" case: tid=0009 (debugger process, calling thread, main debugger loop) tid=001a (debuggee thread 1) --- snip --- .. 0009: queue_apc( thread=(nil), process=0x54, call={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,addr=0x7fff0000} ) 001a: *wakeup* signaled=192 cookie=0x7ffdb7b4 0009: queue_apc() = 0 { handle=0x68, self=0 } 0009: select( flags=4, cookie=0x32d30c, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=infinite, result={}, handles={0x68} ) 0009: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=infinite, call={APC_NONE} } 001a: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ffdb7b4, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=1c8f097946d2824 (-0.1787600), result={}, handles={} ) 001a: select() = USER_APC { apc_handle=0x68, timeout=1c8f097946d2824 (-0.1787600), call={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,addr=0x7fff0000} } 001a: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ffdb7b4, signal=(nil), prev_apc=0x68, timeout=1c8f097946d2824 (-0.1792110), result={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,status=40000002,base=(nil),alloc_base=(nil),size=0,state=0,prot=0,alloc_prot=0,alloc_type=0}, handles={} ) 0009: *wakeup* signaled=0 cookie=0x32d30c 001a: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=1c8f097946d2824 (-0.1792110), call={APC_NONE} } 0009: get_apc_result( handle=0x68 ) 0009: get_apc_result() = 0 { result={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,status=40000002,base=(nil),alloc_base=(nil),size=0,state=0,prot=0,alloc_prot=0,alloc_type=0} } --- snip --- Now the interesting one, which ultimately leads to block of calling thread ... tid=0009 (debugger process, calling thread, main debugger loop) tid=001a (debuggee thread 1) tid=001b (debuggee thread 2) --- snip --- 0009: continue_debug_event( pid=0019, tid=001a, status=65538 ) 001a: *wakeup* signaled=258 cookie=0x7ffdb7b4 001b: *wakeup* signaled=258 cookie=0x7ffd77b4 0009: continue_debug_event() = 0 .. 0009: read_process_memory( handle=0x54, addr=0x7ffd8000 ) 001a: *signal* signal=19 0009: read_process_memory() = 0 { data= {} } 0009: read_process_memory( handle=0x54, addr=0x7ffd4000 ) 001a: *signal* signal=19 0009: read_process_memory() = 0 { data={} } 0009: queue_apc( thread=(nil), process=0x54, call={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,addr=(nil)} ) 001b: *wakeup* signaled=192 cookie=0x7ed44874 0009: queue_apc() = 0 { handle=0x68, self=0 } 001a: load_dll( handle=(nil), base=0x61090000, size=102400, dbg_offset=0, dbg_size=0, name=0x13e468, filename=L"C:\\windows\\system32\\msacm32.dll" ) 001a: *sent signal* signal=10 001b: *sent signal* signal=10 001a: load_dll() = 0 .. 0009: select( flags=4, cookie=0x32d30c, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=infinite, result={}, handles={0x68} ) 0009: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=infinite, call={APC_NONE} } 001a: set_thread_context( handle=0xfffffffe, flags=00010007, suspend=1, context= {...}) 001a: set_thread_context() = 0 { self=1 } 001b: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ed44874, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=infinite, result={}, handles={0x4c} ) 001b: select() = USER_APC { apc_handle=0x68, timeout=infinite, call={APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY,addr=(nil)} } 001a: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ffdb7b4, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=0, result={}, handles={} ) 001a: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=1c8f09794c8b694 (+0.0000000), call={APC_NONE} } 001b: set_thread_context( handle=0xfffffffe, flags=00010007, suspend=1, context= {...}) 001b: set_thread_context() = 0 { self=1 } 001b: select( flags=4, cookie=0x7ffd77b4, signal=(nil), prev_apc=(nil), timeout=0, result={}, handles={} ) 001b: select() = PENDING { apc_handle=(nil), timeout=1c8f09794c90dc4 (+0.0000000), call={APC_NONE} } ... --- snip --- At this point, tid=0009 (debugger) is blocked forever. When the APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY user APC is queued, remote thread 001b is selected/destined to carry out the APC. After thread 001a and 001b woke up, a dynamic library is loaded from thread 001a which results in LOAD_DLL_DEBUG_EVENT dispatched. This initiates the suspension of all threads in the child process (SIGUSR1 is sent for 001a and 001b). Thread 001a is suspended first, 001b next. The suspension of 001b happens to a time when 001b is about to carry out the APC_VIRTUAL_QUERY. Meanwhile thread 0009 (calling process) is waiting for APC completion result forever because it's blocked by VirtualQueryEx in debugger loop, unable to receive and process any debug event. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 21

[Bug 10249] New: Battlefield2/SafeDisc 4. x and Punkbuster services cause lockup: child processes debugging misconception
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 11, 2021

Feb. 11, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10249 Summary: Battlefield2/SafeDisc 4.x and Punkbuster services cause lockup: child processes debugging misconception Product: Wine Version: CVS/GIT Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: wine-kernel AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Created an attachment (id=8876) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=8876) WINEDEBUG=-all,+server,+tid,+loaddll,+seh wine ./BF2.exe +fullscreen 0 +szx 800 +szy 600 &>/tmp/debug_pipe Hello, while testing some PunkBuster stuff on popular games, I came across Battlefield 2 which employs SafeDisc 4.x It seems there is a problem with debuggers in chained child processes. Consider following scenario: --- snip process list --- pid threads parent executable (all id:s are in hex) 0000001b 1 00000008 'PnkBstrA.exe' 0000000c 2 00000008 'explorer.exe' 0000000a 2 00000008 '~e5.0001' 00000008 4 00000000 'BF2.exe' --- snip process list --- --- snip thread list --- process tid prio (all id:s are in hex) 0000001b 0000001c 0 0000000c 00000010 0 0000000d 0 0000000a 00000012 0 0000000b 0 00000008 0000001a 1 00000014 15 00000013 0 00000009 0 --- snip thread list --- "BF2.exe" = parent (game) "~e5.0001" = 1st child = SafeDisc 4.x process = "debugger" "PnkBstrA.exe" = 2nd child = PunkBuster Update Service The 1st child acts as debugger for the parent "BF2.exe" and receives all debug events (process, thread creation, dll load/unload...) There are lots of breakpoint events triggered from parent. This is part of SafeDisc 4.x and used for on-the-fly decryption of code sections (child decrypts code of father). When PunkBuster is initialized (loading of pbcl = client, pbag = agent), the following services should get started: PnkBstrA.exe, PnkBstrB.exe and finally the kmode driver PnkBstrK.exe The service process "PnkBstrA.exe" is started from main process "BF2.exe" (which is a debuggee itself). No debug flags (DEBUG_PROCESS | DEBUG_ONLY_THIS_PROCESS) are specified in process creation flags. The debugger (child of parent, receives the process creation event) does not make debugger_attach() to the newly created child process. The child process seems to inherit the state of being a "debuggee": wine server -> new_process -> set_process_debugger( process, parent->debugger ); The parent got its process->debugger from debugger_attach(). This leads to a problem in child process startup code: "dlls/kernel32/process.c:start_process()" checks the PEB->BeingDebugged field and if set, a system breakpoint is encountered before the entry code is called. This breakpoint results in debug event - seen by debugger. Unfortunately this event is _not_ expected by debugger because it didn't expect another debuggee (child) to be created. Ok, long story short solution: If you debug a process by attaching to an already created process, you _must_ treat default debugging flags as if the process has been created with DEBUG_ONLY_THIS_PROCESS, meaning that all childs created by debuggee will NOT automagically become debuggees. Short and (hopefully) acceptable patch snippet: --- snip --- diff --git a/server/debugger.c b/server/debugger.c index a64a17a..c59f3a0 100644 --- a/server/debugger.c +++ b/server/debugger.c @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static int debugger_attach( struct process *process, struct thread *debugger ) resume_process( process ); return 0; } + process->create_flags |= DEBUG_ONLY_THIS_PROCESS; return 1; error: --- snip --- And yes, the patch (snippet) works as intended (tm) ;-) Attached for sake of completeness is relevant server trace. Search for "001c:trace:seh:raise_exception code=80000003 flags=0 addr=0x7b870ed8 " to the point where the entry system breakpoint is triggered. Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 17

[Bug 20230] New: GetThreadTimes() and the Actual and Pseudo Current Thread Handles
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 11, 2021

Feb. 11, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20230 Summary: GetThreadTimes() and the Actual and Pseudo Current Thread Handles Product: Wine Version: 1.1.30 Platform: PC URL: http://rh-software.com OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: ray(a)pobox.co.uk Some time ago I had an issue with SIV being unable to read the thread CPU time usage when using GetThreadTimes(). I tracked down to the following and then did a work-a-round. The "Current Thread" effectively has 2 current thread handles, these are the actual thread handle and the ~0 pseudo handle as returned by GetCurrentThread(). When a call is made to GetThreadTimes() this calls NtQueryInformationThread( ThreadTimes ) which contains the test "if (handle == GetCurrentThread())". As a result of this when GetThreadTimes() is called with the actual thread handle no data is returned. \WINE-1.1.30\dlls\ntdll\thread.c(1011): if (handle == GetCurrentThread()) I suspect the code should be changed to allow both the pseudo and actual thread handles to be used as a minimum, better still would, when possible, be to implement this function for any thread. While searching the source I also noticed: NTSTATUS WINAPI NtSetInformationThread( HANDLE handle, THREADINFOCLASS class, LPCVOID data, ULONG length ) { NTSTATUS status; switch(class) { case ThreadZeroTlsCell: if (handle == GetCurrentThread()) And suspect that code would benefit from a similar fix. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 18

[Bug 23431] New: provide a stub for ntdll.NtSystemDebugControl() (Ollydbg 2.x)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 11, 2021

Feb. 11, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23431 Summary: provide a stub for ntdll.NtSystemDebugControl() (Ollydbg 2.x) Product: Wine Version: 1.2-rc5 Platform: x86 URL: http://www.ollydbg.de/version2.html OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ntdll AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, a simple one... Ollydbg 2.x uses NtSystemDebugControl( DebugSysReadVirtual, ...) to read kernel memory (driver/OS address space) for informational purposes. Failure to do so doesn't cause harm. Although this approach doesn’t require any additional kernel driver (only the SeDebugPrivilege privilege on the running process) it's only useful for Windows XP systems. It's disallowed since Windows Vista/Windows 7. Not really useful in Wine but it obviously needs a stub. --- snip --- wine: Call from 0x7bc3d2d0 to unimplemented function ntdll.dll.NtSystemDebugControl, aborting First chance exception: unimplemented function ntdll.dll.NtSystemDebugControl called in 32-bit code (0x7bc3d2d0). ... =>0 0x7bc3d2d0 __wine_spec_unimplemented_stub+0x50(module="ntdll.dll", function="NtSystemDebugControl") [/opt/wine/wine-build/dlls/ntdll/../../../wine-git/dlls/ntdll/exception.c:268] in ntdll (0x00334434) 1 0x7bc1f895 __wine_stub_NtSystemDebugControl+0x28() in ntdll (0x00334434) 2 0x004467ae in ollydbg (+0x467ad) (0x00334460) 3 0x0044698b in ollydbg (+0x4698a) (0x00334484) --- snip --- Dump params and return STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED to keep it running ;-) Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 6

[Bug 27222] New: dbghelp.dll.SymEnumSourceFilesW needed (ollydbg2)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 11, 2021

Feb. 11, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27222 Summary: dbghelp.dll.SymEnumSourceFilesW needed (ollydbg2) Product: Wine Version: 1.3.20 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: dbghelp AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, while attaching to a target using JIT (replacing winedbg), the following crash occurred: --- snip --- wine: Call from 0x7b838aa3 to unimplemented function dbghelp.dll.SymEnumSourceFilesW, aborting --- snip --- A stub keeps it from crashing (though it should not be hard to implement a wide character version). +tid,+dbghelp: --- snip --- ... fixme:dbghelp:SymEnumSourceFilesW 0x58 400000 (null) 0x4c06d8 0x400000: stub! fixme:dbghelp:SymEnumSourceFilesW 0x58 68350000 (null) 0x4c06d8 0x68350000: stub! fixme:dbghelp:SymEnumSourceFilesW 0x58 68490000 (null) 0x4c06d8 0x68490000: stub! fixme:dbghelp:SymEnumSourceFilesW 0x58 68530000 (null) 0x4c06d8 0x68530000: stub! fixme:dbghelp:SymEnumSourceFilesW 0x58 68590000 (null) 0x4c06d8 0x68590000: stub! fixme:dbghelp:SymEnumSourceFilesW 0x58 685b0000 (null) 0x4c06d8 0x685b0000: stub! fixme:dbghelp:SymEnumSourceFilesW 0x58 685f0000 (null) 0x4c06d8 0x685f0000: stub! ... --- snip --- Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 8

[Bug 27802] New: ollydbg2 crashes on unimpl dbghelp.dll.SymEnumSourceLinesW stub
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 11, 2021

Feb. 11, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27802 Summary: ollydbg2 crashes on unimpl dbghelp.dll.SymEnumSourceLinesW stub Product: Wine Version: 1.3.24 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: dbghelp AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: focht(a)gmx.net Hello, ollydbg2 crashes when trying to display source: --- snip --- ... wine: Call from 0x7b8384bb to unimplemented function dbghelp.dll.SymEnumSourceLinesW, aborting --- snip --- Stop at process main (dlls along with their debug syms loaded). "View" -> "Source Files" -> double click any source file $ wine --version wine-1.3.24-174-g4b4dd30 Regards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 7

[Bug 28075] New: total commander ultima prime 5.5 does not start
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 10, 2021

Feb. 10, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28075 Summary: total commander ultima prime 5.5 does not start Product: Wine Version: 1.3.26 Platform: x86-64 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: martin.suc(a)googlemail.com Hi, Total commander ultima prime version 5.5 has been installed but did not start. Error: The program TC UP.exe has encountered a serious problem and needs to be close. If you can please let me know how to investigate to give you more information. Kind Regards, Martin -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 5

[Bug 13249] New: Putty: Yes/No/Cancel dialog moving with keyboard arrows
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Feb. 10, 2021

Feb. 10, 2021

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13249 Summary: Putty: Yes/No/Cancel dialog moving with keyboard arrows Product: Wine Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: munozferna(a)gmail.com I was trying to create an automated test for putty, and I noticed that there is a problem between the Cancel and No button on a Yes/No/Cancel dialog. There seem to be '2' controls between them when you move through the buttons with the keyboard arrows. This dialog appears when establishing a connection to a server, putty asks for a confirmation to accept rsa2 keys. I also noticed that the OK / Cancel dialog seems to have 'two' more tabs position, so instead of going to OK when you press arrow key on Cancel, it goes 'nowhere' two times. If you use the tab key it seems to work fine. I am currently using wine-1.0-rc1. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

2 25