March 2017 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 42179] New: Better detect which tests need to be rerun
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42179 Bug ID: 42179 Summary: Better detect which tests need to be rerun Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The TestBot sometimes does not always know which tests need to be rerun and thus tries to run the test executable with no argument. This typically happens in the following circumstances: * When a non-C file is patched, such as a resource or JavaScript file. * When a test file is removed. This case is actually similar to the previous case where the non-C file is the Makefile.in file. Note however that if there is only one test file this works anyway because in that case the test executable just runs that one test by default. I added some test cases for this in the TestBot test suite: https://github.com/fgouget/wine/tree/wtbsuite -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 41720] New: Advanced bug search excludes NEEDINFO bugs by default
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41720 Bug ID: 41720 Summary: Advanced bug search excludes NEEDINFO bugs by default Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: ken(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- Go to <https://bugs.winehq.org/query.cgi?format=advanced>. In the Status list, all statuses except CLOSED and NEEDINFO are initially selected. NEEDINFO should also be selected. Only CLOSED should be excluded. I don't know if NEEDINFO bugs are included in the simple search's Status: Open pop-up menu item. See <https://bugs.winehq.org/query.cgi?format=specific>. They should be. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 41216] New: Dependency Packages for EL7 compatible Systems
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41216 Bug ID: 41216 Summary: Dependency Packages for EL7 compatible Systems Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: b.barwich(a)hotmail.com CC: michael(a)fds-team.de, sebastian(a)fds-team.de Distribution: --- I am running a CentOS 7 system with an old wine version and I would like to update to the latest official stable Version, but this version is not packaged on any compatible EL7 repository. I checked out the instructions on https://wiki.winehq.org/Fedora but I found that the guide starts at Fedora 22 while CentOS 7 is mostly compatible with Fedora 19 and 20 and hardly with Fedora 21 because of Package Dependencies. I also checked out the recommended "RPM Fusion" Repository but I had to find out that it only offers packages for EL5 and EL6 systems. It is not updated yet to EL7 while effectively suffers from missing Packages that are not shipped by RHEL. So without the "RPM Fusion" Repository I checked out how many Package Dependencies I have available from the required ones in the manual. The Manual at https://wiki.winehq.org/Fedora requires 81 pendent Packages # echo "alsa-plugins-pulseaudio.i686 glibc-devel.i686 glibc-devel libgcc.i686 libX11-devel.i686 freetype-devel.i686 libXcursor-devel.i686 libXi-devel.i686 libNX_Xext-devel.i686 libXext-devel.i686 libXxf86vm-devel.i686 libXrandr-devel.i686 libXinerama-devel.i686 mesa-libGLU-devel.i686 mesa-libOSMesa-devel.i686 libXrender-devel.i686 libpcap-devel.i686 ncurses-devel.i686 libzip-devel.i686 lcms2-devel.i686 zlib-devel.i686 libv4l-devel.i686 libgphoto2-devel.i686 libcapifax-devel.i686 cups-devel.i686 libxml2-devel.i686 openldap-devel.i686 libxslt-devel.i686 gnutls-devel.i686 libpng-devel.i686 flac-libs.i686 json-c.i686 libICE.i686 libSM.i686 libXtst.i686 libasyncns.i686 libedit.i686 liberation-narrow-fonts.noarch libieee1284.i686 libogg.i686 libsndfile.i686 libuuid.i686 libva.i686 libvorbis.i686 libwayland-client.i686 libwayland-server.i686 llvm-libs.i686 mesa-dri-drivers.i686 mesa-filesystem.i686 mesa-libEGL.i686 mesa-libgbm.i686 nss-mdns.i686 ocl-icd.i686 pulseaudio-libs.i686 python-talloc.x86_64 sane-backends-libs.i686 tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 unixODBC.i686 samba-common-tools.x86_64 samba-libs.x86_64 samba-winbind.x86_64 samba-winbind-clients.x86_64 samba-winbind-modules.x86_64 mesa-libGL-devel.i686 fontconfig-devel.i686 libXcomposite-devel.i686 libtiff-devel.i686 openal-soft-devel.i686 mesa-libOpenCL-devel.i686 opencl-utils-devel.i686 alsa-lib-devel.i686 gsm-devel.i686 libjpeg-turbo-devel.i686 pulseaudio-libs-devel.i686 pulseaudio-libs-devel gtk3-devel.i686 libattr-devel.i686 libva-devel.i686 libexif-devel.i686 libexif.i686 glib2-devel.i686"|tr -s " " "\n"|wc -l 81 but on my system I have only 68 / 81 Packages available # yum info alsa-plugins-pulseaudio.i686 glibc-devel.i686 glibc-devel libgcc.i6 libX11-devel.i686 freetype-devel.i686 libXcursor-devel.i686 libXi-devel.i686 libNX_Xext-devel.i686 libXext-devel.i686 libXxf86vm-devel.i686 libXrandr-devel.i686 libXinerama-devel.i686 mesa-libGLU-devel.i686 mesa-libOSMesa-devel.i686 libXrender-devel.i686 libpcap-devel.i686 ncurses-devel.i686 libzip-devel.i686 lcms2-devel.i686 zlib-devel.i686 libv4l-devel.i686 libgphoto2-devel.i686 libcapifax-devel.i686 cups-devel.i686 libxml2-devel.i686 openldap-devel.i686 libxslt-devel.i686 gnutls-devel.i686 libpng-devel.i686 flac-libs.i686 json-c.i686 libICE.i686 libSM.i686 libXtst.i686 libasyncns.i686 libedit.i686 liberation-narrow-fonts.noarch libieee1284.i686 libogg.i686 libsndfile.i686 libuuid.i686 libva.i686 libvorbis.i686 libwayland-client.i686 libwayland-server.i686 llvm-libs.i686 mesa-dri-drivers.i686 mesa-filesystem.i686 mesa-libEGL.i686 mesa-libgbm.i686 nss-mdns.i686 ocl-icd.i686 pulseaudio-libs.i686 python-talloc.x86_64 sane-backends-libs.i686 tcp_wrappers-libs.i686 unixODBC.i686 samba-common-tools.x86_64 samba-libs.x86_64 samba-winbind.x86_64 samba-winbind-clients.x86_64 samba-winbind-modules.x86_64 mesa-libGL-devel.i686 fontconfig-devel.i686 libXcomposite-devel.i686 libtiff-devel.i686 openal-soft-devel.i686 mesa-libOpenCL-devel.i686 opencl-utils-devel.i686 alsa-lib-devel.i686 gsm-devel.i686 libjpeg-turbo-devel.i686 pulseaudio-libs-devel.i686 pulseaudio-libs-devel gtk3-devel.i686 libattr-devel.i686 libva-devel.i686 libexif-devel.i686 libexif.i686 glib2-devel.i686|grep -i nombre|sort|uniq|wc -l 68 from the "RPM Fusion" Repository there are 20 Packages required # echo "libmpg123-devel.i686 gstreamer-plugins-base-devel gstreamer-devel.i686 gstreamer.i686 gstreamer-plugins-base.i686 gstreamer-devel gstreamer1.i686 gstreamer1-devel gstreamer1-plugins-base-devel.i686 gstreamer-plugins-base.x86_64 gstreamer.x86_64 gstreamer1-devel.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-base-devel gstreamer-plugins-base-devel.i686 gstreamer-ffmpeg.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-devel.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-extras.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-good-extras.i686 gstreamer1-libav.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld.i686"|tr -s " " "\n"|wc -l 20 but without this Repository I have only 8 / 20 Packages available: # yum info libmpg123-devel.i686 gstreamer-plugins-base-devel gstreamer-devel.i686 gstreamer.i686 gstreamer-plugins-base.i686 gstreamer-devel gstreamer1.i686 gstreamer1-devel gstreamer1-plugins-base-devel.i686 gstreamer-plugins-base.x86_64 gstreamer.x86_64 gstreamer1-devel.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-base-devel gstreamer-plugins-base-devel.i686 gstreamer-ffmpeg.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-devel.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-extras.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-good-extras.i686 gstreamer1-libav.i686 gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld.i686|grep -iE "nombre[^\:]*:"|sort|uniq|wc -l 8 This is mostly due to RHEL7 not shipping most i686 Packages anymore. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 39385] New: Make the VM descriptions visible
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39385 Bug ID: 39385 Summary: Make the VM descriptions visible Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- Each VM has a long description of its hardware and software configuration. They are meant to help developers figure out what's special about a specific VM and how it may explain its results. The long descriptions can be found on the test.winehq.org site by looking at individual reports information. But they cannot be seen on the testbot.winehq.org site except by the administrator when editing the VM configuration. They should be visible as a tooltip/infotip in most places when the VM's name is displayed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 34256] New: Please add "See Also" support for NetBSD, FreeBSD, etc.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34256 Bug #: 34256 Summary: Please add "See Also" support for NetBSD, FreeBSD, etc. Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 URL: http://source.winehq.org/git/bugzilla.git/blob/HEAD:/B ugzilla/Bug.pm#l2854 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: kennybobs(a)o2.co.uk Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 45590 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=45590 Error screen See attached screenshot. Could someone with the relevant skills please add support for adding bug trackers for the following to the "See Also" link? FreeBSD (http://www.freebsd.org/support/bugreports.html) Linux (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/) Illumos/OpenIndiana (https://www.illumos.org/issues/) NetBSD (http://www.netbsd.org/support/query-pr.html) Solaris (http://bugs.sun.com/) OpenBSD has shut down their bug tracking system. *shrugs* http://www.openbsd.org/query-pr.html Not urgent, but useful. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 39414] New: Add a partway job status
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39414 Bug ID: 39414 Summary: Add a partway job status Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- If a task is completed the corresponding job's status is 'Running' even if none or the remaining tasks is actually Running. So one can sometimes end up with dozens of 'Running' jobs when only one or two among them actually has an active task. So the idea would be to reserve the 'Running' status to jobs for which one task is actually running. Jobs where some tasks but not all have completed would instead have the 'Partway' status (suggestions for another name welcome). Another issue is that when multiple jobs are in the 'Running' or 'Partway' state it's hard to know which ones have been modified the most recently because the 'Ended' field is not set. This is probably less important though and a waterfall like presentation would help (see bug 39413). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 41600] New: Unable to view pre-moderated post in forum
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41600 Bug ID: 41600 Summary: Unable to view pre-moderated post in forum Product: WineHQ.org Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: www-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: brewmanz(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- I've just posted a comment in a forum thread, and wish to alter/add another comment ... but I can't find my post in 'view your posts'! -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 40240] New: ntdll:exception causes the Windows 10 VM to crash
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40240 Bug ID: 40240 Summary: ntdll:exception causes the Windows 10 VM to crash Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- The ntdll:exception test causes the Windows 10 VM (w1064) to crash. Given that this does not happen on real hardware it is a TestBot bug. Incidentally this is why we don't get any WineTest result from that VM. Either there is a way to avoid the crash by adjusting the QEMU configuration or a QEMU bug should be filed. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 39413] New: Make it easier to monitor the TestBot activity
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39413 Bug ID: 39413 Summary: Make it easier to monitor the TestBot activity Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fgouget(a)codeweavers.com Distribution: --- At the bottom of the main page there is a list of the VMs and their status. However the information there is incomplete: * When a VM is reverting there is no way to know for how long it has been reverting. * When a VM is running a task there is no link to the corresponding task. * There is no history of events so if someone reports that something strange happened there is no way to check(*). So it would be nice to have something like BuildBot's Waterfall display. http://buildbot.buildbot.net/waterfall (*) Actually one could check the WineTestBot log but that has its own problems and requires poring over lots of traces. See bug 39410. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 2

[Bug 42070] New: Add "workaround" to defined keywords list to indicate that one or more workarounds are available for a bug.
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org Nov. 4, 2018

Nov. 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42070 Bug ID: 42070 Summary: Add "workaround" to defined keywords list to indicate that one or more workarounds are available for a bug. Product: WineHQ Bugzilla Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: bugzilla-unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: o.dierick(a)piezo-forte.be Distribution: --- Enhancement: Add "workaround" to the defined keyword list for open bugs, when one ore more working workarounds have been found. For Moderators: The conditions for the workaround keyword to be valid would be: - The workaround is documented in the comments or a reference is made to the AppDB entry where the workaround is documented (or to an external source). - The workaround is confirmed to be working at least for one person (not just an hypothetic workaround). - If multiple workarounds are discussed, the keyword is valid if one workaround meets the above conditions. Why the keyword?: Other users affected by a bug would know that a workaround exists without having to read all the comments to find out. If someone has documented a workaround in the AppDB for a specific application, and the bug is in fact affecting multiple applications, the keyword would reduce the need to document the workaround in the AppDB for every affected app, provided that the bug is properly referenced in the multiple AppDB entries. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5