September 2017 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 36231] New: SfcIsFileProtected function unimplented
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 4, 2018

July 4, 2018

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36231 Bug ID: 36231 Summary: SfcIsFileProtected function unimplented Product: Wine Version: 1.7.18 Hardware: x86 URL: http://www.gamershell.com/download_36990.shtml OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: jarkko_korpi(a)hotmail.com sha1sum Drakensang_DEMO_setup_ENGLISH.exe 2e47a2fbc7307e736394bf1d2b1a2f09c497c7a1 Size 500,7Mb. I installed the demo into clean prefix and noticed at command line: fixme:sfc:SfcIsFileProtected ((nil), L"C:\\Program Files\\Drakensang - DEMO\\unins000.exe") stub Which lead me here http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa382536%28v=vs.85%… SfcIsFileProtected function Determines whether the specified file is protected. Applications should avoid replacing protected system files. Syntax C++ BOOL SfcIsFileProtected( _In_ HANDLE RpcHandle, _In_ LPCWSTR ProtFileName ); Parameters RpcHandle [in] This parameter must be NULL. ProtFileName [in] The name of the file. Return value If the file is protected, the return value is a nonzero value. If the file is not protected, the return value is zero. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 40419] New: Blade and Soul installer crashes
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 4, 2018

July 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40419 Bug ID: 40419 Summary: Blade and Soul installer crashes Product: Wine-staging Version: 1.9.7 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: linuxdonald(a)posteo.de CC: erich.e.hoover(a)wine-staging.com, michael(a)fds-team.de, sebastian(a)fds-team.de Distribution: --- The installer crashes with: wine: Call from 0x7b43cd3c to unimplemented function sfc.dll.SRSetRestorePointW, aborting wine: Unimplemented function sfc.dll.SRSetRestorePointW called at address 0x7b43cd3c (thread 0009), starting debugger... -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 40452] New: Devil May Cry 4 Benchmark instillation fails
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 4, 2018

July 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40452 Bug ID: 40452 Summary: Devil May Cry 4 Benchmark instillation fails Product: Wine Version: 1.9.7 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: levanchelidze(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 54201 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=54201 becktrace I tried to install dmc 4 benchmark on a clean prefix and the installation crashed -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 40521] New: Max Payne 3 Installation wants sfc.dll.SRSetRestorePointW function
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 4, 2018

July 4, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40521 Bug ID: 40521 Summary: Max Payne 3 Installation wants sfc.dll.SRSetRestorePointW function Product: Wine Version: 1.9.8 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: berillions(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- Hi, At the beginning and at the end of Max Payne 3 installation, i have this error message in the output console : wine: Call from 0x7b43bc8c to unimplemented function sfc.dll.SRSetRestorePointW At the end, Wine crash when the installer wants to install DirectX libraries. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 3

[Bug 39452] New: WNetGetUniversalName() returns ERROR_NO_NETWORK (0x000004c6)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 3, 2018

July 3, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39452 Bug ID: 39452 Summary: WNetGetUniversalName() returns ERROR_NO_NETWORK (0x000004c6) Product: Wine Version: 1.7.52 Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: alexey.pushkin(a)mererand.com Distribution: --- WNetGetUniversalName() is a stub function and it returns ERROR_NO_NETWORK (0x000004c6). I believe it should instead return ERROR_NOT_CONNECTED, which would mean that Wine treats the path argument as a _local_ path. See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa385474%28v=vs.85… According to WINEDEBUG=relay Intel MPI (https://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mpi-library) pmi_proxy.exe exits after receiving ERROR_NOT_CONNECTED from WNetGetUniversalName(). -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 17

[Bug 43383] New: valgrind shows several definite leak in dlls/qcap/tests/ smartteefilter.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 3, 2018

July 3, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43383 Bug ID: 43383 Summary: valgrind shows several definite leak in dlls/qcap/tests/smartteefilter.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: qcap Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: Gentoo ==31520== 72 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 321 of 616 ==31520== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==31520== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==31520== by 0x4F1442B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==31520== by 0x606C8DA: ??? ==31520== by 0x4A21688: IMediaSample_SetMediaType (strmif.h:2289) ==31520== by 0x4A21688: media_thread (???:0) ==31520== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==31520== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==31520== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==31520== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==31520== ==31520== 72 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 322 of 616 ==31520== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==31520== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==31520== by 0x4F1442B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==31520== by 0x606C8DA: ??? ==31520== by 0x5FF3D18: ??? ==31520== by 0x5FF3F76: ??? ==31520== by 0x60006CA: ??? ==31520== by 0x4A21771: IMemInputPin_Receive (strmif.h:3041) ==31520== by 0x4A21771: media_thread (???:0) ==31520== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==31520== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==31520== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==31520== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==31520== ==31520== 72 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 324 of 616 ==31520== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==31520== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==31520== by 0x4F1442B: IMalloc_fnAlloc (ifs.c:187) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: IMalloc_Alloc (objidl.h:1405) ==31520== by 0x4F14CCB: CoTaskMemAlloc (???:0) ==31520== by 0x606C8DA: ??? ==31520== by 0x5FF3D18: ??? ==31520== by 0x5FF4014: ??? ==31520== by 0x60006CA: ??? ==31520== by 0x4A21771: IMemInputPin_Receive (strmif.h:3041) ==31520== by 0x4A21771: media_thread (???:0) ==31520== by 0x7BC913B3: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9143B: call_thread_func (signal_i386.c:2759) ==31520== by 0x7BC91391: ??? (signal_i386.c:2700) ==31520== by 0x7BC9B3EE: start_thread (thread.c:487) ==31520== by 0x4244249: start_thread (pthread_create.c:333) ==31520== by 0x433FD6D: clone (clone.S:114) ==31520== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 1

[Bug 40346] New: Unable to install winehq-devel on debian jessie (tries to download 1.9.5 when 1.9.6 is the only version on the server)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 3, 2018

July 3, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40346 Bug ID: 40346 Summary: Unable to install winehq-devel on debian jessie (tries to download 1.9.5 when 1.9.6 is the only version on the server) Product: Packaging Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: wine-packages Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: Bob-winehq(a)HamsterRepublic.com CC: michael(a)fds-team.de, sebastian(a)fds-team.de Distribution: --- Hello! I am trying to install winehq-devel on Debian Jessie using the instructions provided at https://wiki.winehq.org/Debian When I get to the step where I: apt-get install winehq-devel It fails with the following 404 error messages: E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/pool/main/w/wine-devel/wine-devel-… HttpError404 E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/pool/main/w/wine-devel/wine-devel-… HttpError404 E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/pool/main/w/wine-devel/wine-devel_… HttpError404 E: Failed to fetch https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/pool/main/w/wine-devel/winehq-deve… HttpError404 E: Unable to fetch some archives, maybe run apt-get update or try with --fix-missing? I checked the download server, and I can see that the files for version 1.9.5 indeed do not exist there, but the files for 1.9.6 DO exist. I went poking around a bit, and I discovered that in https://dl.winehq.org/wine-builds/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/ the Release file references 1.9.6, but the Release.gz references 1.9.5 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 24

[Bug 38172] New: Smite: Hi-Rez Studios Authenticate and Update Service fails
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 2, 2018

July 2, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38172 Bug ID: 38172 Summary: Smite: Hi-Rez Studios Authenticate and Update Service fails Product: Wine Version: 1.7.37 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ole Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: fincer89(a)hotmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 50922 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=50922 Smite - installer (InstallSmite.exe) terminal output The game is not installable due to this issue. The Hi-Rez Studios Update Service tries to open itself but instead, throws bunch of ole errors in terminal and fails. Short terminal output as an attachment. Long ole backtrace uploaded on dropbox (Wine Bugzilla file size limit exceeded): https://www.dropbox.com/s/a56idpskq5hw550/wine_smite_oledebug?dl=1 Windows mode: Win7 Fresh 32-bit wineprefix winetricks vcrun2008 (required by the game) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 30

[Bug 40969] New: Wine: DLL Injection on suspended process provides NULL arg for static library' s DLLMain's lpvReserved value
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org July 1, 2018

July 1, 2018

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40969 Bug ID: 40969 Summary: Wine: DLL Injection on suspended process provides NULL arg for static library's DLLMain's lpvReserved value Product: Wine Version: 1.9.14 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: aheinerm(a)gmail.com Distribution: --- WINE does not respect the behaviour of the lpvReserved argument in DLLMain. >From the documentation of DllMain (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682583(v=vs.85).…) ~~~ lpvReserved [in] If fdwReason is DLL_PROCESS_ATTACH, lpvReserved is NULL for dynamic loads and non-NULL for static loads. If fdwReason is DLL_PROCESS_DETACH, lpvReserved is NULL if FreeLibrary has been called or the DLL load failed and non-NULL if the process is terminating. ~~~~ WINE does NOT respect this behaviour. # EXAMPLE Given the following: A.exe, B.dll, C.dll C.dll is statically linked from both A.exe and B.dll. A.exe's process is started and suspended. B.dll is injected into the A.exe process. At some point the DllMain of C.dll is called. In WINE, the lpvReserved argument is NULL, even though C.dll is statically loaded. In Windows 7, 8, and 10, the lpvReserved argument is non-null. # REAL WORLD IMPACT https://github.com/bwapi/bwapi/issues/598 https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40259 Blizzard Entertainment's Storm.dll library uses the lpvReserved to invoke a different behaviour in its DllMain (why, I have no idea). Their video game Starcraft: Broodwar is statically linked to this library. The third-party hack DLL called BWAPI.dll is also statically linked to Storm.dll. The Hack launcher called ChaosLauncher starts and suspends the Starcraft process and injects various hacks (one being BWAPI). The error in the tracking issue above is surfaced. The issue surfaced because Storm performs some alternative initialization logic that corrupts its ability to function correctly later. In order to temporarily work around the issue I have forcefully undone the logic made in the other DLL to cause it to malfunction. In this case the executable and statically linked library are owned by a company and their source codes are not available. It should be possible to reproduce the issue in a more trivial example. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7

[Bug 35533] New: Make it possible to see the sent patch files inline without extra download step
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org June 29, 2018

June 29, 2018

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35533 Bug ID: 35533 Summary: Make it possible to see the sent patch files inline without extra download step Product: Wine-Testbot Version: unspecified Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: dmitry(a)baikal.ru Classification: Unclassified Currently clicking on a patch file attached to a job leads to a save file dialog, it would be preferable (at least to me) to be able to see it inline. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 7