February 2018 - Wine-Bugs - list.winehq.org

[Bug 33071] New: Adobe Reader XI not installing
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 10, 2019

May 10, 2019

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33071 Bug #: 33071 Summary: Adobe Reader XI not installing Product: Wine Version: 1.5.24 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: fernandocarvalhocoelho(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 43721 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=43721 Terminal output for wine-1.5.24 Adobe Reader is not installing on wine-1.5.24 Here is the link for downloading the application: http://ardownload.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/win/11.x/11.0.02/en_US/AdbeRdr… -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 11

[Bug 40772] New: Error message and black screen in Stranger of Sword City
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 5, 2019

May 5, 2019

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40772 Bug ID: 40772 Summary: Error message and black screen in Stranger of Sword City Product: Wine Version: 1.9.11 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: funtimeschaos(a)rocketmail.com Distribution: --- Created attachment 54671 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=54671 Console output on clean wine install 1.9.11 When trying to start Stranger of Sword City, a window opens and an error message says: "Failed to create sound engine. SE or BGM may not play properly. This issue might be resolved by installing DirectX End User Runtime. For more details, please check the About DirectX section in the Stranger of Sword City Manual." The game window remains black, though the cursor in it is changed (mostly likely to the game's built in cursor) and nothing else happens. I've also tried running it with directx9 installed via winetricks, only to receive the same message. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 4

[Bug 43390] New: valgrind shows a few definite leaks in dlls/xaudio2_7/ tests/xaudio2.c
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 5, 2019

May 5, 2019

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43390 Bug ID: 43390 Summary: valgrind shows a few definite leaks in dlls/xaudio2_7/tests/xaudio2.c Product: Wine Version: 2.12 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: download, source, testcase, valgrind Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: xaudio2 Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: austinenglish(a)gmail.com Distribution: Gentoo ==3551== 8 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 63 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5C85281: XAudio2Create (xaudio_dll.c:2159) ==3551== by 0x4A1B741: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1150) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 12 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 94 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5C7DA6D: CreateAudioVolumeMeter (xapofx.c:795) ==3551== by 0x4A1B1A7: test_xapo_creation_modern (xaudio2.c:1053) ==3551== by 0x4A1B463: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1089) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 12 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 95 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5C7DAFA: CreateAudioReverb (xapofx.c:809) ==3551== by 0x4A1B2D4: test_xapo_creation_modern (xaudio2.c:1067) ==3551== by 0x4A1B463: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1089) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 12 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 96 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5C7DA6D: CreateAudioVolumeMeter (xapofx.c:795) ==3551== by 0x4A176DB: test_simple_streaming (xaudio2.c:293) ==3551== by 0x4A1B807: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1158) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 48 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 349 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5CA3F03: ??? ==3551== by 0x5CA4059: ??? ==3551== by 0x4A1A97C: test_xapo_creation_legacy (xaudio2.c:932) ==3551== by 0x4A1B3ED: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1083) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 48 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 350 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5C37F03: ??? ==3551== by 0x5C38059: ??? ==3551== by 0x4A1A97C: test_xapo_creation_legacy (xaudio2.c:932) ==3551== by 0x4A1B401: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1084) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 48 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 351 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5CA3F03: ??? ==3551== by 0x5CA4059: ??? ==3551== by 0x4A1A97C: test_xapo_creation_legacy (xaudio2.c:932) ==3551== by 0x4A1B415: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1085) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 48 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 352 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5CA3F03: ??? ==3551== by 0x5CA4059: ??? ==3551== by 0x4A1A97C: test_xapo_creation_legacy (xaudio2.c:932) ==3551== by 0x4A1B429: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1086) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 48 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 353 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5CA3F03: ??? ==3551== by 0x5CA4059: ??? ==3551== by 0x4A1A97C: test_xapo_creation_legacy (xaudio2.c:932) ==3551== by 0x4A1B43D: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1087) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 48 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 354 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5E44F03: ??? ==3551== by 0x5E45059: ??? ==3551== by 0x4A1A97C: test_xapo_creation_legacy (xaudio2.c:932) ==3551== by 0x4A1B451: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1088) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== ==3551== 48 bytes in 4 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 355 of 766 ==3551== at 0x7BC51061: notify_alloc (heap.c:254) ==3551== by 0x7BC5554F: RtlAllocateHeap (heap.c:1716) ==3551== by 0x5C7DC35: CreateFX (xapofx.c:835) ==3551== by 0x4A1AE99: test_xapo_creation_modern (xaudio2.c:1018) ==3551== by 0x4A1B463: test_xapo_creation (xaudio2.c:1089) ==3551== by 0x4A1B5B4: func_xaudio2 (xaudio2.c:1122) ==3551== by 0x4A1C74F: run_test (test.h:603) ==3551== by 0x4A1CBAD: main (test.h:687) ==3551== -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 6

[Bug 44279] New: Wine can' t enumerate HID device that is based on Bluetooth (a Wiimote)
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 4, 2019

May 4, 2019

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44279 Bug ID: 44279 Summary: Wine can't enumerate HID device that is based on Bluetooth (a Wiimote) Product: Wine Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: epigramx(a)yahoo.com Distribution: --- On Windows, if I run hclient.exe (source here: https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/tree/master/hid/hclient) I can normally see my paired and connected device, as shown in this image: https://i.imgur.com/Up60k7s.png It's one of the Wii Remote Plus devices. However, if I do pair and connect the device on Debian and if it correctly appears in /sys/bus/hid/devices and all the tests here work: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XWiimote , running hclient.exe with wine on linux does not find that hid device which might explain why it's not detected by a console application that relies on enumerating HID devices on windows. I suspect it's a limitation of wine in finding HID devices if they originate from Bluetooth but I can't be sure. I might return with more details later on (when I reboot to Linux) but let me know if you need specific further details. Wiimotes are very common so if a dev could try one and see if he can enumerate it in hclient (source above) that'd be great. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 44556] New: SYN_DROPPED undeclared on Linux < 2.6.39
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 4, 2019

May 4, 2019

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44556 Bug ID: 44556 Summary: SYN_DROPPED undeclared on Linux < 2.6.39 Product: Wine Version: 3.2 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: winebus.sys Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: Zenitur(a)yandex.ru Distribution: --- When I build Wine on GNU/Linux with 2.6.37 kernel, I'd an error "SYN_DROPPED undeclared". Google says that it was appear in 2.6.39 and tslib project has this code: https://github.com/kergoth/tslib/blob/master/plugins/input-raw.c #ifndef SYN_DROPPED /* < 2.6.39 kernel headers */ # define SYN_DROPPED 3 #endif -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 41869] New: undefined reference to `HIDIOCSFEATURE'
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 4, 2019

May 4, 2019

https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41869 Bug ID: 41869 Summary: undefined reference to `HIDIOCSFEATURE' Product: Wine Version: 1.9.24 Hardware: x86 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: -unknown Assignee: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org Reporter: version2013(a)openmailbox.org Distribution: --- Created attachment 56272 --> https://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=56272 log file undefined reference to `HIDIOCSFEATURE' my system command: ldd --version ldd (GNU libc) 2.10.1 command: uname -r 3.0.66 command: gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.3.4 -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.

1 17

[Bug 13881] New: Stack limits error, hardware incompatibility?
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 3, 2019

May 3, 2019

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13881 Summary: Stack limits error, hardware incompatibility? Product: Wine Version: 1.0-rc4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: dav666666(a)gmail.com Hello. I'm trying to play GunZ : The Duel. Don't delete this bug because you think it's game related. It is not. Why? Everyone got the game working. Except me. I tried reinstalling the whole system and it crashed on a fresh install too. I tried on my brother's computer and it worked without any problem. All this make me think it's a hardware related problem but I need your help to determine which of my hardware is causing trouble. I explained my problem on GunZ page on Winedb: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=12057, it is the comment called "Stack limits" I hope you will find a fix, GunZ is the last game that makes deleting windows from my computer impossible... Sorry for english, I'm belgian, I did my best to write correct sentences... -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 10530] New: Flyff doesn't work with wine
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 3, 2019

May 3, 2019

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10530 Summary: Flyff doesn't work with wine Product: WineHQ Apps Database Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: website-bugs AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: nitzan65(a)gmail.com Flyff Shows me a white screen. Please fix it thanks! -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 5

[Bug 11319] New: GameOverlay (Steam friends In-game) crashes on start
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 2, 2019

May 2, 2019

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11319 Summary: GameOverlay (Steam friends In-game) crashes on start Product: Wine Version: 0.9.53. Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: sagman.staredsi(a)gmail.com Created an attachment (id=10425) --> (http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=10425) A GameOverlayRenderer log The GameOverlayUI.exe and GameOverlayRenderer.dll (Steam in-game friends interface) crashes on start. I attach a log created by the Steam.exe . The file refers to GameOverlayRenderer.dll and this log attach that the dlls or exe wich fails are: 01: hl2.exe 02: ntdll.dll 03: KERNEL32.dll 04: user32.dll 05: gdi32.dll 06: advapi32.dll 07: GameOverlayRenderer.dll 08: winex11.drv 09: imm32.dll Also attach here a minilog (it's 2 lines) of wine trying to start "GameOverlayUI.exe" $ wine GameOverlayUI.exe fixme:process:SetProcessShutdownParameters (000003ff, 00000000): partial stub. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 13

[Bug 32945] New: Fetion 2013 January reported the OS version is too old
by wine-bugs＠winehq.org May 1, 2019

May 1, 2019

http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945 Bug #: 32945 Summary: Fetion 2013 January reported the OS version is too old Product: Wine Version: 1.5.23 Platform: x86 URL: http://download.fetion-portal.com/Fetion2013_January.e xe OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: -unknown AssignedTo: wine-bugs(a)winehq.org ReportedBy: litimetal(a)gmail.com Classification: Unclassified Created attachment 43507 --> http://bugs.winehq.org/attachment.cgi?id=43507 screenshot My computer: Fedora 16 32bit wine-1.5.23-81-g237ed21 1. remove ~/.wine then $wine notepad to have a clean wineprefix 2. download Fetion from http://download.fetion-portal.com/Fetion2013_January.exe 3. wine Fetion2013_January.exe Then the program would show a dialog. Brief Translation: "The Version of your OS is too old. Please use an OS whose virsion is higher than Win 2000 SP4 or Win XP SP2. Will you continue anyway?" I chose yes, and the installation *seemed* to finish successfully. BTW， It seems that this program has more than one bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.winehq.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.

1 9