http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60156 --- Comment #13 from Rafał Mużyło <galtgendo@o2.pl> --- If you really want to discuss philosophy, the distinction is pretty arbitrary. Cause while real AI is likely still not there yet anytime soon, LLMs are both much further *and* much closer than it seems. The question 'when does intelligence begin ?' is quite like 'how does self-awareness arise ?' (wrt. biological entities). Building and teaching an LLM is not that much different than our learning process - not the *formal* learning, but learning to walk, talk, etc. The problem is a bit like with fusion - not the process itself, but making it self-sustaining. We still have significant gaps in our understanding of our learning process, so it's quite difficult to translate that knowledge into recipes for a system that has some non-trivial differences from our own, even if it's currently a bit more primitive. And the legal part, if not for the standard corporate cash grabs, would be as nonsense and murky as 'software patents'. (that is I acknowledge current wine's policies on this topic, but believe them to be nonsense, not wrt. wine, but generally; well, AI bug slop aside) -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.