http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59186 --- Comment #14 from Stian Low <wineryyyyy@gmail.com> --- (In reply to calmstorm from comment #11)
What I meant by 620, is that above I wrote 820, which it turns out was wrong.
Thanks for clarifying. Your driver seems not at fault and correctly reporting then: Vendor: Intel (0x8086) Device: Mesa Intel(R) UHD Graphics 620 (KBL GT2) (0x5917) Therefore gpu_device_name() seems to be missing a mapping for your 0x5917 and already has a mapping for 0x5916 so it seems your model just needs to be added to the list and maybe elsewhere: case MAKELONG(0x8086, 0x3ea0): return "Intel(R) UHD Graphics 620"; case MAKELONG(0x8086, 0x5916): return "Intel(R) HD Graphics 620"; I'll add it and submit a merge request so that it will be supported for an upcoming release. (In reply to calmstorm from comment #13)
Should I open a new issue about what i have noticed?
I don't think opening a new bug report is necessary until the graphics card is supported because it may also solve the performance problem if it changes some graphics pipeline componnents with a correct mapping. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.