http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59899 --- Comment #3 from Austin English <austinenglish@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Martin Storsjö from comment #2)
Ok, that makes sense, that it would work but hurt performance. Yes I realize that this is for easing support for 16/64k pages on the host OS.
I guess that I can revert/override this locally for size conscious builds.
(I wonder if linux distributions will notice/care about this. It shouldn't really affect the size of compressed packages anyway, I think, only the installed size.)
Could this be gated behind a configure flag fit those users/distressed that want it? -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.