Sept. 24, 2026
1:03 a.m.
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50418 --- Comment #3 from Esme Povirk <madewokherd@gmail.com> --- Extracted the code from the installers (without installing) and disassembled the method in question. It is indeed invalid IL code: It's an unconditional branch followed by stdfld. There are no instructions that flow into the stsfld instruction before it, so the IL stack is empty, and stdfld needs a value. The code here does not appear to be obfuscted, but I don't know what compiler produces IL like this. Anyway, the resequencer should fix this, once it exists. -- Do not reply to this email, post in Bugzilla using the above URL to reply. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.